ARTICLE
25 October 2024

FERC Ends Reactive Power Compensation

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On October 17, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued Order No. 904, Compensation for Reactive Power Within the Standard Power Factor Range (the "Final Rule")...
United States California New York Energy and Natural Resources

On October 17, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued Order No. 904, Compensation for Reactive Power Within the Standard Power Factor Range (the "Final Rule"), determining it unjust and unreasonable for transmission providers to charge transmission customers for a generating facility's provision of reactive power within the standard power factor range.1

The Final Rule provides that each FERC-regulated transmitting utility must revise its pro forma open-access transmission tariff, pro forma large generator interconnection agreement, and pro forma small generator interconnection agreement, to prohibit the inclusion in transmission rates of any charges related to the provision of reactive power within the standard power factor range. This effectively terminates all typical compensation for reactive power in the United States.

Background

Power generation facilities produce, and sometimes sell, reactive power, a byproduct of power generation (the primary products being capacity and energy). Reactive power compensation is predicated on the generator demonstrating to FERC that it can produce reactive power and support the costs of associated equipment and facilities. In New England and New York, eligible generators are compensated based on their size and reactive capability. However, in California and the Southwest Power Pool—two FERC-regulated regions—there is no compensable reactive power product. In all other FERC-regulated regions, a generator must undergo a formal FERC ratemaking proceeding, which is always intricate and contentious, in order to be compensated for reactive power. When successful, a reactive power rate filing typically operates as a flat monthly payment from the applicable transmission provider.

The Final Rule and Its Significance

The Final Rule makes clear that no payments will be made to new or existing generators for reactive power within the standard power factor range. As a result, transmission providers are only required to pay an interconnection customer for reactive power when the transmission provider requests or directs the customer to operate its facility outside the standard power factor range of .95/.95 leading/lagging, known as the "deadband."

Most importantly, the Final Rule does not allow for grandfathering of existing reactive rates:

We disagree... that generating facilities with reactive rates on file prior to the effective date of the final rule be provided legacy treatment. Given that the Commission finds above that allowing transmission providers to compensate generating facilities, affiliated and unaffiliated, for providing reactive power within the standard power factor range has resulted in unjust and unreasonable transmission rates, it would raise undue discrimination concerns to continue to provide payment through Schedule 2 for reactive power supply within the standard power factor range to generating facilities with rates already on file when those rates have been found to be unjust and unreasonable. Although commenters point to other situations where the Commission has provided legacy treatment for existing rates, in those situations the existing rate had not been found to be unjust and unreasonable.

All transmission providers, whether in RTO/ISO or non-RTO/ISO regions, must submit a compliance filing within 60 days of the effective date of the Final Rule, including a proposed effective date within 90 days from the date of the compliance filing. FERC will allow ISO-NE, NYISO, and PJM to each request a later effective date, for FERC's consideration, to allow them to develop and propose changes to their market rules necessary to accommodate the elimination of compensation for reactive power within the standard power factor range.

As of now, there are no filings with FERC for rehearing of the Final Rule, although we do expect rehearing requests (and, potentially, appeals to federal courts of appeals). Any such rehearing filing will not stay the effectiveness of the Final Rule.

Footnote

1. We described the proceedings before FERC to ban payments to new and existing generators for reactive power within the standard power factor range in a previous Legal Update.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More