ARTICLE
25 October 2016

DOJ Files "Statement Of Interest" In FHA Case Concerning Criminal Background Screens

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

Hispanic applicants for housing as there are a higher percentage of African Americans and Hispanics in jail then their percentage of the population would otherwise indicate.
United States Real Estate and Construction
Fox Rothschild LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Automotive, Basic Industries and Insurance industries

While individuals with a criminal record are not listed as one of the seven protected class in our federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), the Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) issued guidelines in April 2016 indicating that some apartment criminal screens have a "disparate impact" on African American and Hispanic applicants for housing as there are a higher percentage of African Americans and Hispanics in jail then their percentage of the population would otherwise indicate. As such, the federal government is taking the position that management evaluate prospective residents with screening criteria which is not overly broad or contains generalizations that "disproportionately disqualify" individuals based on a legally protected trait – such as race (African American) or national origin (Hispanic). HUD now takes the view that while housing providers may still consider criminal records in the application process, ownership should not make decisions which do not involve a particularized analysis of: (a) the specific offense; (b) how long ago was the offense; and (c) what rehabilitation the individual has done since the date of the conviction.

Demonstrating this new emphasis, earlier this month the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a "statement of interest" in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in a FHA case brought by an organization that assists those released from jail who have problems finding housing following a completed prison sentence. DOJ's legal brief is intended to help the judge evaluate whether a specific criminal screening matrix results is unlawful discrimination if it simply uses generalized concerns about safety. In the New York case, the allegations are that management's policy resulted in a refusal to rent to anyone with a prior conviction (felony or misdemeanor) other than traffic offenses.

The takeaway: If you have not started already, I would suggest professional apartment ownership and management review your criminal screening policy. I have now provided comments on a number of screens.  My goal is to work within the new guidance and still provide legitimate health and safety protections for our other residents, our staff members, and our properties. Look, DOJ and HUD have put management on notice and you don't want to be the next defendant in a case challenging criminal screens, particularly if you have not had your screen reviewed by counsel.

Just A Thought.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More