In a monumental win for pro-housing advocates, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation essentially exempting most housing and mixed-use projects from CEQA.
In order for a project to qualify for the exemption, the project and site must meet certain enumerated requirements; however, most urban infill sites meet the statutory requirements. There is clear consensus that this is the most significant CEQA bill in CEQA's more than 50-year history.
Essentially, a project is exempt from CEQA if it meets the following requirements:
Project Site Requirements
- The project site is located within an incorporated municipality or within an urban area.
- The project site was previously developed with urban uses, or is substantially surrounded by sites developed with urban uses. Meeting the definition of an urban use is relatively simple for most sites located within a typical urban area.
- The project site is less than 20 acres in size.
- If the project site is located within 500 feet of a freeway, the project must include enhanced air filtration, and cannot include any balconies facing the freeway.
- The project site is not located within a:
- coastal zone;
- prime farmland;
- wetlands;
- high fire severity zone;
- hazardous waste site list, typically referred to as the Cortese list;
- designated earthquake zone;
- special flood hazard area;
- designated conservation area; or
- protected habitat.
Project Requirements
- The project is considered a housing development project, which includes certain mixed-use projects depending on the square footage of non-residential uses.
- The project's density must be at least 50% of the jurisdiction's housing element. (You read that correctly, there is a minimum density requirement!)
- The project does not involve the demolition of a historic resource. Importantly, the "historic resource" must have been placed on a local, state, or federal registry before the project's preliminary application (i.e., SB330) was submitted to the municipality. This eliminates the gamesmanship NIMBYs have relied on in attempting to place a site on an historic resource to delay project approval.
- The project does not include a hotel, motel, or bed-and-breakfast.
- The project is consistent with the property's applicable general plan and zoning.
- The project is consistent with all applicable objective development standards. Importantly, an applicant can rely on State Density Bonus law to modify or waive objective development standards and still be considered consistent with all objective development standards.
- Projects must complete a Phase I environmental site assessment. If any Recognized Environmental Conditions are identified in the Phase I, the applicant must mitigate.
The CEQA exemption does not require a project to include any affordable housing, although affordable housing would be required, if an applicant relies on State Density Bonus law to modify or waive any objective development standards.
Finally, for most projects that are less than 85 feet tall, the exemption does not require any labor obligations. Projects that are taller than 85 feet must pay the prevailing wage, with additional skilled and trained workforce requirements under certain scenarios.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.
© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.
