ARTICLE
27 August 2020

Security People V. Iancu: District Court Lacks Jurisdiction To Hear APA Suit Challenging IPR Constitutionality

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
Security People v. Iancu: District Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Hear APA Suit Challenging IPR Constitutionality.
United States Intellectual Property

In Security People, Inc. v. Iancu, the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent owner's Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") suit challenging the constitutionality of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") canceling patent claims in an inter partes review ("IPR") proceeding. The Federal Circuit explained that constitutional challenges to IPR proceedings can be raised in appeals to the Federal Circuit from the PTAB's final written decisions and affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. For additional details, please see the related post on Finnegan's Federal Circuit IP Blog.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More