United States:
Trenton Ward And Rachel Emsley On Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC And SAS Institute v. Iancu
02 May 2018
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court handed down two opinions in
cases related to inter partes review (IPR). In a 7-2 decision, the
Court upheld the constitutionality of IPRs in Oil States Energy
Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC. Then, in
SAS Institute v. Matal, the Court ruled 5-4 that the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board must review all challenged IPR claims
or none at all. In this podcast, Finnegan attorneys
Trenton Ward and
Rachel Emsley share their insight into these two very important
cases.
To listen to the podcast please click
here
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Trademarks Comparative Guide
Obhan & Associates
Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Defenses To A Claim For Copyright Infringement
Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.
One of the primary considerations you or your company must make upon receipt of a copyright infringement notice is the defenses you or your company may have to the claim for infringement.
Are Environmentalists The New Conservatives?
Whitmyer IP Group
Their ranks swelled as they gained momentum to fulfill their mission of Earth protection, but now that a majority of people agree that protecting the environment is a priority
