ARTICLE
2 May 2018

Trenton Ward And Rachel Emsley On Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC And SAS Institute v. Iancu

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court handed down two opinions in cases related to IPR. In a 7-2 decision, the Court upheld the constitutionality of IPRs in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC.
United States Intellectual Property

On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court handed down two opinions in cases related to inter partes review (IPR). In a 7-2 decision, the Court upheld the constitutionality of IPRs in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC. Then, in SAS Institute v. Matal, the Court ruled 5-4 that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must review all challenged IPR claims or none at all. In this podcast, Finnegan attorneys Trenton Ward and Rachel Emsley share their insight into these two very important cases. 

To listen to the podcast please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More