ARTICLE
25 April 2022

PTAB Will Not Hear AAPA-Basis Grounds

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
In a recent decision invalidating numerous claims of a patent related to cochlear implants for hearing loss, the PTAB found that Petitioner improperly relied on applicant admitted prior art (AAPA) as the "basis" for one asserted ground.
United States Intellectual Property

In a recent decision invalidating numerous claims of a patent related to cochlear implants for hearing loss, the PTAB found that Petitioner improperly relied on applicant admitted prior art (AAPA) as the "basis" for one asserted ground, and then refused to consider that ground on the merits because "we lack the statutory authority to find claims unpatentable on the basis of AAPA . . . ."  See MED-EL Elecktromedizinische Gerate Ges m.b.H. v. Advanced Bionics AG, IPR, IPR202-01016, IPR2021-00044, Paper 42 at 46 (PTAB Mar. 31, 2022). 

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More