ARTICLE
17 March 2021

Fruit Of One's Label: A Review Of Three Key Federal Circuit Wins

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
Innovative pharma has had three decisions from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to cheer about recently: Sanofi v Watson in 2017, Vanda v West-Ward in 2018, and GSK v Teva in 2020.
United States Intellectual Property

Innovative pharma has had three decisions from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to cheer about recently: Sanofi v Watson in 2017, Vanda v West-Ward in 2018, and GSK v Teva in 2020.

Strategically-minded in-house and private practice counsel in the innovator pharma space should look to this trilogy of label-related rulings to help them create comprehensive patent prosecution and litigation strategies for their clients.

In this article, we will review each of these cases and discuss how they help the innovative pharma industry. With respect to GSK v Teva, we note that on February 9, 2021, the Federal Circuit withdrew the opinion we have discussed below and granted rehearing of the appeal on the merits.

Oral argument was held on February 23, 2021 – stay-tuned for the panel's rehearing decision.

Click here to read the full article.

Originally published by Managing Intellectual Property

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More