Tell us about your practice and the types of corporate matters you handle.
My practice revolves primarily around mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and joint ventures (JVs). I advise a number of entertainment clients, including artists, production companies and studios, in collaboration with my colleagues in the firm's Entertainment department.
Catalog sales used to sit squarely within entertainment law. What's driving the shift toward more corporate structuring in these deals?
The value of entertainment assets, especially music, is not necessarily correlated to the general market. Also, thanks to streaming, songs generate revenue for a longer period than ever before. Over the past decade or two, private equity firms have increasingly invested in music catalogs, sometimes alongside strategic investors such as music publishers or labels looking to expand their portfolios.
Given that shift, what trends are you seeing in how these deals are being structured today?
With the entry of private equity, the sophistication and complexity of deals have increased compared with a straightforward music catalog sale. Earnouts are introduced, and sometimes put or call options become relevant—terms that can significantly impact the value proposition. These are concepts that corporate lawyers are well suited to advise on.
When parties decide to form a joint venture to hold catalog assets, what kinds of legal and business considerations typically come into play?
Sometimes the parties decide to share in the profits from a
music catalog in the form of a joint venture, specifically a new
entity formed to hold the assets. In this scenario, the full suite
of corporate considerations comes into play.
Examples include governance, which comprises issues such as board
control, the right to remove a director and minority approval
rights; distribution waterfall, which outlines how profits are
allocated among the JV partners, particularly if they share in
profits in a tiered or preferential order rather than through a
simple pro rata split; and transfer restrictions on the JV
partners' ability to transfer their ownership interest, as
well as corollary concepts like the right of first negotiation, the
right of first refusal and the last-match right, to name a
few—and also put or call options, as mentioned earlier.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.