The evolving anti-money laundering (AML)/countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) environment in Mexico is being reshaped by a confluence of regulatory, geopolitical, and enforcement developments. On 14 May 2015, K2 Integrity hosted a panel with moderator Himamauli Das, senior managing director and counsel at K2 Integrity; Juan Zarate, global co-managing partner and chief strategy officer at K2 Integrity; Mariano Federici, senior managing director at K2 Integrity; Narciso Campos Cuevas, Mexico City partner at White & Case; and Luis Urrutia, AML/CFT expert, examining Mexico's upcoming Financial Action Task Force (FATF) mutual evaluation, recent U.S. designations of Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs), and the broader implications for financial institutions operating across the U.S.-Mexico corridor. Click here to view a recording of the session.
Geopolitical Context and Policy Shifts
The U.S.-Mexico economic and political relationship has undergone significant turbulence under the Trump administration, largely due to the administration's focus on border security, drug trafficking enforcement, and a redefined doctrine of "economic security as national security." This includes threats of tariffs on Mexican imports and the formal designation of eight Mexican cartels as both FTOs and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).
These developments expand legal liabilities and compliance risks for companies with cross-border ties. Financial institutions and multinational firms are now required to reassess exposure, including risks tied to supply chains, counterparties, and client base connections to designated entities. Enhanced due diligence (EDD), beneficial ownership transparency, and regional intelligence sharing are becoming imperative.
FATF Mutual Evaluation
Mexico is preparing for its 2026 FATF mutual evaluation under the updated 2022 methodology, which stresses not only technical compliance but also tangible effectiveness. The onsite evaluation is set for April 2026, with a report due for FATF Plenary discussion by October 2026. This marks a critical inflection point in Mexico's AML/CFT regime.
Mexico's recent National Risk Assessment (NRA) highlights systemic risks linked to transnational criminal organizations, widespread corruption, and a significant informal economy. Priority sectors requiring heightened oversight include:
- Virtual asset service providers (VASPs)
- Remittance services
- Gaming
- Real estate
- Notaries and government contractors
Legacy institutional weaknesses, a lack of coordinated data sharing, and inefficient interagency collaboration could undermine Mexico's effectiveness. There has been a gap between the analytical output from Mexico's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the prosecutorial follow-through from its Attorney General's office. Reforms to bridge these gaps—particularly in asset recovery and actionable intelligence sharing—will be closely scrutinized.
New Enforcement and Compliance Frontiers
The designation of Mexican cartels as FTOs significantly elevates the risk profile for entities in Mexico and those doing business with Mexican partners. U.S. law prohibits material support to FTOs, and the definition of "material support" is broad, encompassing funding, services, and even inadvertent supply chain involvement.
Mere extortion payments—common in cartel-influenced regions—could be construed as material support. Firms must:
- Reassess regional and sector-specific risk exposure
- Conduct robust internal audits of compliance frameworks
- Enhance training programs for legal, compliance, and operations staff
- Engage local and cross-border legal counsel for scenario planning and mitigation
Firms must evolve beyond baseline regulatory compliance to incorporate proactive, intelligence-led risk management. Risk assessments must be tailored to operational geographies and lines of business. Enhanced due diligence, effective whistleblower protections, and real-time transaction monitoring are key.
Bilateral Cooperation on Economic Security
There is renewed momentum behind U.S.-Mexico economic security cooperation, driven by shared threats such as fentanyl trafficking and global economic competition. Ongoing bilateral engagement is fostering heightened demands for cooperation around:
- Joint law enforcement coordination
- Investment screening mechanisms (akin to CFIUS)
- Information-sharing channels between FIUs and banking sectors
- Trade negotiations consistent with Trump administration priorities
Institutions that align compliance practices with national risk assessments and contribute meaningfully to enforcement through suspicious transaction reporting (STR) will be better positioned in the FATF process. The private sector's role in shaping national responses, particularly in sectors vulnerable to criminal infiltration, is increasingly valued by regulators.
Conclusion
The convergence of FATF scrutiny, FTO designations, and shifting U.S. foreign economic policy has created a demanding compliance environment for businesses tied to Mexico. Institutions must move quickly to close programmatic gaps, bolster their understanding of regional threats, and establish trusted channels for cross-border intelligence and enforcement collaboration.
As both governments signal openness to deeper cooperation, and FATF's standards continue to evolve, the private sector has a critical role to play—not only in mitigating legal and reputational risks but in shaping a resilient, rules-based financial system in the region.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
