ARTICLE
13 July 2026

NAIC Financial Condition (E) Committee Approves RBC Changes

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is an international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major corporations, funds, and financial institutions in their most important and complex transactions and disputes.
The NAIC's Financial Condition Committee has approved three significant proposals affecting insurance company risk-based capital calculations, including revised RBC factors for collateralized loan obligations and collateral loans. These changes will impact how state regulators assess insurer capital adequacy and take corrective action for weakly capitalized companies.
United States Insurance
Lawrence R. Hamilton’s articles from Mayer Brown are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit and Insurance industries
Mayer Brown are most popular:
  • within Compliance topic(s)

On July 8, 2026, the Financial Condition (E) Committee (“E” Committee) of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) adopted three proposals that had previously been adopted by its Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force (CAD TF).

NAIC rules provide that in order to become effective for the year-end RBC calculation, RBC changes need to be adopted by the CAD TF by June 30.  In many cases, the CAD TF action is considered final, but certain major RBC changes are also reviewed and approved “up the chain” by the “E” Committee, and that was the case for the following three proposals:

  • The “E” Committee approved a revised Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Preamble (Attachment A to the meeting materials)
    • The RBC Preamble is the authoritative summary of the history, purpose, and uses of the NAIC’s RBC system and the role of the CAD TF in administering it.
    • The revised RBC Preamble had been adopted by the CAD TF and the Risk-Based Capital Model Governance (EX) Task Force at a joint meeting on June 18, as the culmination of a multi-year process.
    • The revised RBC Preamble reaffirms that the purpose of RBC is to help state insurance regulators identify weakly capitalized insurers and take corrective action, and not to rank insurers generally or to make comparisons between adequately capitalized insurers.
    • The revised RBC Preamble does not include some of the language in prior drafts that would have discouraged the public dissemination of insurers’ RBC ratios, but notes that state laws generally prohibit insurers and their agents from using RBC ratios to compare competitors.
  • The “E” Committee approved new Life RBC factors, effective December 31, 2026, for collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), collateralized bond obligations (CBOs) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) (Attachment B to the meeting materials).
    • The new Life RBC factors had been adopted by the CAD TF on June 30, 2026.
    • Note that the new Life RBC factors for CLOs will apply to both broadly syndicated loan (BSL) and middle market loan (MM) CLOs, although the additional RBC charge for thinner tranches will only apply to BSL CLOs.
    • For details, see our June 23 article The NAIC RBC Investment Risk and Analysis (E) Working Group Has Made Its Decision on New Life RBC Factors for CLOs.
    • The “E” Committee declined a request from interested party commenters to direct the CAD TF and its Risk-Based Capital Investment Risk and Evaluation (E) Working Group (RBC IRE WG) to commission analytical work on MM CLOs by the American Academy of Actuaries to validate or recommend changes to the RBC factors for MM CLOs in time for the 2027 RBC calculation.  Instead, the chair of the “E” Committee stated that the chair of the RBC IRE WG would provide details on the RBC IRE WG’s next projects at the NAIC Summer National Meeting in August.
    • Property/Casualty and Health RBC factors are not affected.
  • The “E” Committee approved new Life RBC factors, effective December 31, 2027, for collateral loans (i) backed by interests in joint ventures, partnerships and limited liability companies and (ii) backed by residual interests (Attachment C to the meeting materials).

At the conclusion of the meeting, the Chair of the NAIC’s Investment Designation Analysis (E) Working Group made an important announcement. He noted that on November 19, 2024, the NAIC had adopted amendments to Part Two of the Purposes and Procedures Manual of the NAIC Investment Analysis Office (IAO) that grant IAO staff the discretion to challenge an NAIC Designation Category assigned to a security through the filing-exempt process (i.e., based on a rating agency rating) if they think it is not a reasonable assessment of investment risk of the security for regulatory purposes.  He noted that although the discretionary challenge process was scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2026, implementation had been delayed because of the time required to modify the NAIC’s technology systems to accommodate the challenge process.  He reported—big news—that the technology modifications have now been completed and accordingly the IAO discretionary challenge process is now operational.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More