ARTICLE
20 April 2020

CMS Sending Hospice Cap Demands Ahead Of Schedule

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
Hospice providers within regions administered by NGS are reporting that NGS is presently finalizing and serving out final 2019 hospice cap repayment demands. 
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Hospice providers within regions administered by NGS are reporting that NGS is presently finalizing and serving out final 2019 hospice cap repayment demands. This action, which tacks on sequestration (funds never received) to revenue, is entirely inappropriate and must be rescinded.

In years past, after hospices would submit self-reports (end of February), CMS and its contractors would wait at least six months (August) before finalizing cap demands. This was reasonable in light of shifting per-patient allowances under the pro-rated allocation method (2/3 of expected allowance change will occur by then). Because sequestration (amounts never paid) is not included in the self-report, these final demands are invariably materially higher than self-reported demands. In the final demand, CMS adds sequestration to revenue to determine "amount of payment made"; the legality of this practice is sitting before multiple Federal judges right now.

For the first time, and in the midst of a National Emergency, CMS has accelerated the timetable for issuing final demands, apparently so as to require "repayment" of that sequestration (funds never paid to the provider) sooner.

The result is that hospices facing cap demands, and trying to cope with a National Emergency that touches on their sober responsibilities to our terminally ill seniors, are pressed right now for additional repayments (repayments of incremental money (sequestration) that is arguably not due at all, in so far as sequestered funds are never paid over to the provider in the first place).

It is hard to overstate how insensitive, tone deaf, and absurd this new policy is. At a time when private banks are deferring mortgage payments for U.S. citizens generally, and when the Federal government is deferring all tax liability, CMS insists upon more timely assertion of repayment demands as to incremental amounts that are entirely disputed (sequestration). If a private business accelerated its creditor demands on unmeritorious claims in the midst of a National Emergency, there would be indictments. So why is CMS doing this?

CMS and NGS must immediately reverse course and rescind these final 2019 hospice cap demands generally.

We are all in this together.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More