ARTICLE
12 January 2026

Federal Court Orders CFPB To Continue Requesting Funding Operations Amid Defunding Dispute

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On December 30, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered that the CFPB must continue requesting funding from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System...
United States Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On December 30, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered that the CFPB must continue requesting funding from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the statutory funding framework established by Congress. The Court ruled that the CFPB may not decline to request funding based on its interpretation of the Federal Reserve's operating losses or an asserted lack of available "combined earnings." (previously discussed here).

The order followed growing pushback to the CFPB's decision to stop requesting funding from the Federal Reserve, a move that the agency warned would cause it to exhaust available funds in early 2026. In addition, a coalition of state attorneys general, who alleged that declining to request funding would effectively shut down the agency, recently filed a lawsuit, arguing that the cease in funding would disrupt federally mandated consumer protection functions and undermine state enforcement efforts that rely on CFPB data, supervision, and complaint processing.

The D.C. District Court concluded that the statute governing CFPB funding requires the agency to seek the funds necessary to carry out its congressionally assigned responsibilities and that a refusal to do so would be inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The court also found that declining to request funding would effectively eliminate an agency created by Congress, a result that cannot be accomplished without congressional authorization.

Putting It Into Practice: The CFPB's operational posture remains unsettled following its attempted half to funding requests. While the Bureau must now seek funding from the Federal Reserve, questions remain about how these disputes may affect the timing, scope, and intensity of CFPB enforcement, supervision and policy activity this year. We will stay on top of these developments and provide an update as the case progresses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More