ARTICLE
3 December 2025

OCC Confirms Bank Authority To Hold Crypto-Assets As Principal For Paying Network Fees

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On November 18, the OCC issued Interpretive Letter 1186 confirming that a national bank may, as an activity incidental to the business of banking, pay crypto-asset network fees to support otherwise permissible banking activities.
United States Finance and Banking
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On November 18, the OCC issued Interpretive Letter 1186 confirming that a national bank may, as an activity incidental to the business of banking, pay crypto-asset network fees to support otherwise permissible banking activities. The letter also states that a bank may hold, as principal, limited amounts of crypto-assets on its balance sheet when needed to cover these fees. In addition, the OCC confirmed that banks may hold small quantities of crypto-assets as principal for purposes of testing crypto-asset platforms.

The OCC framed these activities as a modern extension of established bank powers, emphasizing that limited principal holdings can support operational efficiency and customer transactions when tied to foreseeable network-fee needs. The agency noted that these activities must remain de minimis, risk-controlled, and integrated into existing compliance and oversight programs.

Putting It Into Practice: Federal regulators continue to clarify the scope of permissible digital-asset activities (previously discussed here and here). Banks considering distributed-ledger integrations should reassess network-fee dependencies, confirm that any crypto-asset holdings remain de minimis and purpose-driven, and update internal controls and governance frameworks accordingly. Financial institutions should continue monitoring federal and state supervisory developments as digital-asset requirements evolve.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More