ARTICLE
14 May 2025

CFPB Seeks To Vacate The Medical Debt Rule

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
The CFPB on April 30, 2025, reached an agreement with lender trade groups to vacate the Prohibition on Creditors and Consumer Reporting Agencies Concerning...
United States Finance and Banking

The CFPB on April 30, 2025, reached an agreement with lender trade groups to vacate the Prohibition on Creditors and Consumer Reporting Agencies Concerning Medical Information Rule (the Medical Debt Rule). The joint motion for entry of consent judgment was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas one month before the stay on the rule's effective date was set to expire.

The Medical Debt Rule prohibited consumer reporting agencies from "furnishing medical debt information to creditors – even coded information." The Consumer Data Industry Association (CDIA) and Cornerstone Credit Union League filed suit against the CFPB in January 2025, arguing that the Medical Debt Rule violated 15 U.S.C. § 1681(g)(1), which allows consumer reporting agencies to report a consumer's medical debt information on consumer reports on the condition that the medical information is coded to prevent disclosure of the individual's medical condition, procedure or physician. In a joint motion for consent judgment, the parties acknowledged that "the rule contradicts the clear and unambiguous language of the statute."

This consent judgment is one of the most recent efforts the CFPB has taken to eliminate litigation challenging the validity of several final rules. As Holland & Knight previously reported, the CFPB sought to vacate the Credit Cart Late Fee Rule after trade groups and financial institutions filed suit alleging that the rule exceeded the CFPB's statutory authority. These decisions, along with the CFPB's current investigation into guidance documents that infringe upon the rulemaking process, as Holland & Knight previously reported, support the Trump Administration's efforts to scale back the scope and agenda of the CFPB.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More