The Act, passed by the New York state legislature last month, aims to address the consequences of the permanent cessation of LIBOR for specified contracts, securities, and other agreements that are economically linked to LIBOR, and does so via an amendment to the New York General Obligations Law that adds a new Article 18-C. The Act allows existing "tough legacy" contracts governed by New York law - that do not include adequate interest rate fallback provisions that contemplate a permanent cessation of LIBOR - to use regulator-recommended replacement indexes. The Act establishes that the recommended benchmark replacement is a "commercially reasonable substitute for and a commercially substantial equivalent to LIBOR" and that using the recommended benchmark replacement "provides a safe harbor from litigation." While most LIBOR indexes will retire by year end, several of its classes may receive a reprieve from the phase out until mid-2023, in part to permit older contracts that lack a clear replacement rate to expire naturally, helping to reduce the threat to financial stability. According to the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), the group guiding the LIBOR transition, nearly $2 trillion worth of debt ascribed to U.S. dollar LIBOR will not mature until after the discredited rate expires in 2023.
Key provisions of the Act include:
- Replacing LIBOR, in any vehicle that (a) uses LIBOR as a benchmark and contains no fallback provisions, or (b) contains fallback provisions that result in a benchmark replacement - other than a recommended benchmark replacement - that is based in any way on any LIBOR value, with the benchmark replacement based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) - the only currently recommended rate by ARRC - and spread adjustment recommended by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or the ARRC, on the date that LIBOR permanently ceases to be published or is announced to no longer be representative;
- Prohibiting parties from refusing to perform contractual duties or declaring a breach of contract based on the discontinuance of LIBOR or use of a replacement;
- Establishing that the legislative benchmark replacement is a commercially reasonable substitute for, and a commercially substantial equivalent to, LIBOR;
- Establishing a safe harbor from litigation for the use of the recommended benchmark replacement;
- Validating the implementation of "benchmark replacement conforming changes" associated with and reasonably necessary to the use of the recommended benchmark replacement; and
- Permitting parties to opt-out of any mandatory application of the Act by written agreement.
While the new Act only affects contracts governed by New York state law, many financial contracts that are governed by the laws of other jurisdictions would fall within the scope of the Act. To mind this gap, Representative Brad Sherman of California proposed federal LIBOR transition legislation similar to the Act, and this draft legislation, titled The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act of 2021, has gained steam, earning reviews and comments from various industry and consumer groups as well as the ARRC. On April 14, 2021, major financial industry groups, including the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Structured Finance Association, and the American Bankers Association, jointly submitted a letter to members of the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee urging passage of the federal law based on the ARRC's proposal. The bill gained further support on April 15, 2021, when key financial regulators, including staffers from the Federal Reserve and the OCC, expressed approval of the legislative effort in testimony before the House Financial Services subcommittee. This federal legislation would broaden the scope of relief to contracts governed by the laws of any U.S. jurisdiction. As currently proposed, the federal legislation would preempt all states' laws on the subject, including the Act, to create a nationwide standard rather than a hodgepodge of potentially conflicting or inconsistent state laws.
1 The Senate bill is designated S297B, and the bill version passed by the Senate was adopted as A164B in the Assembly, to be codified at Article 18C of the New York General Obligations Law.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.