ARTICLE
1 March 2022

Bill Would Allow Acceptance Of Virtual Currency

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
Nearly nine years ago, I observed that Section 107 of the California Corporations Code forbids a corporation, social purpose corporation, association, or individual from either issuing or putting in circulation ...
United States California Technology

Nearly nine years ago, I observed that Section 107 of the California Corporations Code forbids a corporation, social purpose corporation, association, or individual from either issuing or putting in circulation "as money, anything but the lawful money of the United States". This prohibition, which was once included in Article XII, Section 5 of the 1879 California Constitution, even managed to survive its own repeal in 2014. See Why The General Corporation Law Still Prohibits The Issuance Of Money By Corporations.

Earlier this month, Assembly Member Jordan Cunningham introduced legislation, AB 2689, to allow private and public entities to accept virtual currency as a method of payment "[n]otwithstanding Section 107 of the Corporations Code". The bill would define "virtual currency" as "a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, unit of account, or store of value, and is often secured using blockchain technology".

Although Bitcoin was reportedly birthed in 2008, I could find no reference to bitcoin in a published decision of California court before Justice Margulies' opinion in Archer v. Coinbase, Inc., 53 Cal. App. 266 (2020).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More