ARTICLE
5 March 2025

When Wildfire Toxins Contaminate Stormwater: Essential IGP Compliance Steps

GG
Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger

Contributor

Greenberg Glusker is a full-service law firm in Los Angeles, California with clients that span the globe. For 65 years, the firm has delivered first-tier legal services, rooted in understanding clients' intricate business needs and personal concerns. With tailored solutions driving outstanding results, we go beyond the practice of law; we become committed partners in our clients' success.
On February 14, 2025, the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) issued a compliance guidance letter for industrial facilities subject...
United States Environment

On February 14, 2025, the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) issued a compliance guidance letter for industrial facilities subject to the Statewide Industrial Stormwater General Permit (IGP) and located in wildfire-affected counties under a Governor-declared state of emergency. This guidance addresses wildfire-related contamination in stormwater discharges and outlines compliance options available to affected dischargers. The guidance recognizes that negative wildfire impacts on industrial facilities may include higher levels of pollutant in the stormwater discharges unrelated to the industrial activities. Below are the key takeaways.

Unrepresentative Stormwater Samples

If impacted by wildfires, facilities must still collect, analyze, and report stormwater samples even if wildfire contamination—not industrial activity—contributes to elevated pollutant levels. However, dischargers may:

  • Identify and report wildfire-impacted samples;
  • Provide photographic documentation of affected areas; and
  • Submit a rationale explaining why results are not representative of facility operations.

Such claims must be documented and submitted in SMARTS within 30 days of receiving lab results. Dischargers may also invoke Cal. Water Code §13385(j)(B) (natural disasters) for regulatory relief.

Exemptions for Unsafe Sampling Conditions

Sampling/visual observations are not required if:

  • The facility is inaccessible due to fire damage or government closures; or
  • Conditions pose a mudslide or safety hazard after storms.

All missed sampling events must be documented in the SWPPP and Annual Report with a justification. The justification should include wildfire-specific information related to missed sampling events and visual observations.

Non-Qualifying Storm Events

If a discharge is not representative of industrial activities, it may be submitted as a non-qualifying storm event in SMARTS and will not count toward Numeric Action Level (NAL) exceedances.

Minimum Storm Event Sampling Requirements

Facilities unable to collect the required four qualifying storm event samples per year due to insufficient storms will not be deemed in violation, provided they document a good faith effort to comply.

Temporary Suspension of Industrial Activities

Facilities suspending operations for 10 or more consecutive calendar days may request to pause monitoring requirements if:

  • Sampling is infeasible due to site inaccessibility or unstaffed conditions; and
  • Best Management Practices (BMPs) are implemented to stabilize the site.

Requests must be submitted in SMARTS at least seven days in advance, including a revised SWPPP, justification, and resumption timeline. The Regional Water Quality Control Board may review the information and request revisions or deny the request.

Legal Considerations for Anticipated Non-Compliance

If a facility anticipates non-compliance due to wildfire impacts, it must provide advance notice to:

  • The Regional Water Quality Control Board
  • The local MS4 agency

Key Compliance Takeaways

  1. Reporting Obligations Remain Strict – Even with wildfire-related impacts, facilities must comply unless a valid exemption applies.
  2. Regulatory Flexibility Exists but Requires Proper Documentation – Claims for relief must be supported by clear evidence.
  3. Proactive Communication with Regulators is Critical – Early engagement may help mitigate compliance risks.
  4. Mitigate Enforcement Risks –To mitigate enforcement risks, dischargers should document all wildfire-related compliance challenges and consult with environmental counsel to assess regulatory exposure and defenses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More