Lara Beaven of Inside EPA reports this morning on reactions to EPA's announcement that it will make an eighth attempt to determine the jurisdictional reach of the Clean Water Act. Earlier this week EPA asked a Federal District Court Judge in Massachusetts to rule on an NGO challenge to the seventh attempt to stand by while the Biden Administration takes its turn at the plate.
EPA Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator Radhika Fox submitted an affidavit in support of the EPA motion that strongly suggests that EPA's "middle of the road" on this issue is much closer to the Obama Administration side of the street than the Trump Administration side of the street or, for that matter, the Bush and Clinton Administration sides of the street.
So, where does that leave us? Proponents of the Trump Administration rule are complaining that the Biden Administration is going to restore the Obama Administration rule. Proponents of the Obama Administration rule are complaining that EPA hasn't yet reversed the Trump Administration rule. Rightly no one, and I mean no one, is on the record expressing any belief that the eighth attempt to determine the reach of the Clean Water Act by regulation will be the charm.
In the meantime, litigation continues, and more is promised. Ms. Beaven's reporting includes premature promises of litigation over whatever EPA comes up with next by United States Senators Barasso and Cramer. Since they are lawmakers, why aren't these Senators threatening legislation? Is it really impossible for Congress to do its job and find the "middle of the road" on this issue? That you likely consider that a very silly question strongly suggests that we still have quite a ways to go before dawn.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.