ARTICLE
21 April 2015

10 Ways To Get Burned Under The New NLRB Election Rules

FP
Fisher Phillips LLP

Contributor

Fisher Phillips LLP logo
Fisher Phillips LLP is a national law firm committed to providing practical business solutions for employers’ workplace legal problems. Labor and employment law is all the firm does, offering deep and broad knowledge and experience in the area of the law the attorneys know best. Fisher Phillips attorneys help clients avoid legal problems, are dedicated to providing exceptional client service, and are there when you need them. The firm has over 400 attorneys in 34 offices with 33 locations. Learn more at www.fisherphillips.com.
L. Brent Garrett's article "10 Ways to Get Burned Under the New NLRB Election Rules" was featured in Inside Counsel on April 15, 2015.
United States Employment and HR

L. Brent Garrett's article "10 Ways to Get Burned Under the New NLRB Election Rules" was featured in Inside Counsel on April 15, 2015.

The National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) new election rules require employers to navigate a procedural gauntlet between the representation petition and the election. In addition to expediting the process, the new rules impose a vast array of new burdens on employers, including a new Notice of Petition, electronic posting, assorted pre-hearing disclosures and a significantly expanded voter (Excelsior) list.

In the article, Brent discusses ten ways that employers can get burned under the new election procedures.

  1. The union's petition gets stuck in a spam filter
  2. The employer fails to post the "Notice of Petition of Election" within two business days
  3. Pre-existing scheduling conflicts for key witnesses
  4. Failing to serve the Statement of Position by noon the business day before the hearing
  5. Omitting required employee information from the Statement of Position
  6. Failing to "electronically distribute" an Election Notice
  7. Failing to have an "offer of proof" ready at the start of the hearing
  8. Failing to draft a written closing argument before the hearing
  9. Technical non-compliance on the new Excelsior list
  10. Allowing your educational campaign to be sidetracked by burdensome procedural requirements

To read the full article, please visit Inside Counsel.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More