- with readers working within the Construction & Engineering industries
When a marriage ends, one of the most critical steps in the divorce process is often the most overlooked: financial disclosure.
It might sound like a simple exchange of paperwork, but in reality, disclosure forms the foundation of fairness in every divorce case. Without full transparency, courts cannot divide property equitably, determine support, or ensure that both parties are negotiating from an informed position.
In California and other community property states, disclosure is a legal duty. Each spouse is required to provide a complete and accurate picture of their financial situation, from income and assets to debts and investments. The purpose is simple: to make sure neither party gains an unfair advantage and that both can make decisions with full knowledge of what is at stake.
Unfortunately, many spouses underestimate this duty or treat it as a formality. Some even fail to disclose significant assets or business interests, assuming they can be overlooked or discovered later. In family court, that assumption can prove costly.
Statutory and Fiduciary Duties
California law imposes a fiduciary duty between spouses – a standard of "the highest good faith and fair dealing." Under Family Code § 721, each spouse must act with honesty and fairness, especially when financial information is exchanged.
This duty does not end when divorce proceedings begin. In fact, it becomes even more important. The disclosure framework set out in Family Code §§ 2100–2113 requires each spouse to serve both a Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure and, in most cases, a Final Declaration of Disclosure before judgment. These documents identify all assets, debts, income, and expenses, supported by documentation such as tax returns, bank statements, and pay records.
The goal is not just accuracy, but integrity. Each party must be transparent from start to finish, giving the other a full understanding of the marital estate before any agreement or judgment is entered.
Non-Disclosure and Sanctions
The consequences for failing to disclose are serious. Courts treat concealment of assets as a breach of fiduciary duty — one that can lead to sanctions, fee awards, and even forfeiture of the undisclosed property.
In Marriage of Rossi (2001), a California wife failed to disclose that she had won a $1.3 million lottery prize shortly before filing for divorce. When her ex-husband discovered the omission, the court awarded him the entire amount. The message was unmistakable: concealment comes at a price.
Likewise, in Marriage of Feldman (2007), the court imposed over $250,000 in sanctions and more than $140,000 in attorney's fees after a husband failed to fully disclose his financial holdings and business interests. Even partial omissions – not necessarily intentional fraud – can be enough to trigger penalties.
Full disclosure is not optional, and any attempt to conceal or downplay assets will almost certainly backfire.
How Courts Respond
Family courts look beyond technicalities to examine conduct. Judges consider whether disclosures were made in good faith, whether updates were provided as new information arose, and whether one spouse was disadvantaged by the other's lack of transparency.
If the court finds that disclosure was incomplete or misleading, it has wide discretion to act. Remedies can include financial sanctions, setting aside settlements under Family Code § 2122, or awarding an undisclosed asset entirely to the innocent spouse.
Family law judges are consistent in their reasoning: the divorce process is built on trust, and dishonesty undermines the integrity of the entire proceeding.
Ensuring Full Compliance
Proper disclosure begins with organization and ends with accountability. Each spouse should maintain detailed records of assets, debts, and income sources, updating them throughout the divorce process.
Supporting documents matter. Tax returns, business statements, investment accounts, and loan documents should be provided in full, not selectively. When assets are complex, such as ownership interests in a business, a professional valuation may be necessary.
Transparency also extends to communication. Good-faith cooperation between spouses (even in contentious cases) often leads to faster and less costly resolutions. By contrast, evasiveness invites litigation and judicial scrutiny.
In essence, full disclosure is not just compliance; it is strategy. It protects the spouse who follows the law and builds credibility in the eyes of the court.
Modern Asset Challenges
Today's divorces often involve assets that did not exist a decade ago. Cryptocurrency, digital wallets, online investment platforms, and intellectual property royalties all present new challenges for disclosure and valuation.
Unlike traditional bank accounts, these assets can be difficult to trace and easy to conceal. Courts are increasingly alert to this reality, and financial experts now play a larger role in uncovering and evaluating such holdings.
Equity compensation – such as stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based awards – adds another layer of complexity. These assets may not yet be vested or may fluctuate in value, but they must still be disclosed. But the rule is simple: if it exists, it must be listed.
Transparency as a Legal and Ethical Imperative
Financial disclosure is not merely about compliance, it is about fairness. Family law exists to divide what was once shared, and that process cannot function without honesty.
Whether in California, Nevada, or any other community property jurisdiction, the same principle applies: a fair division begins with a full accounting. Spouses who disclose completely protect their interests, their credibility, and the integrity of the process itself.
In the end, disclosure is more than paperwork. It is a reflection of good faith, a safeguard for fairness, and the cornerstone of equitable resolution. In family law, as in any partnership, transparency remains the truest measure of trust.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
