ARTICLE
18 December 2024

Fifth Circuit Nixes Nasdaq Board Diversity Rules

KM
Keating, Meuthing & Klekamp

Contributor

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL is a nationally recognized law firm of approximately 130 lawyers in Cincinnati, Ohio. We deliver sophisticated legal solutions to individuals and businesses of all sizes — from start-up companies to Fortune 50 corporations. While the firm has primarily built its reputation in the tri-state area, including Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana, our unwavering client-first approach has helped us establish a national and international presence.

Since 1954, KMK Law has been a pillar of the Cincinnati community. The attorneys and staff at KMK Law have dedicated themselves to serving as trusted advisors for private and public companies, nonprofits, charity-focused organizations, and individuals from every walk of life. Whether our counsel is to a multi-billion dollar company, or an individual working to make sure their life’s work is protected for their family and the organizations they support, we are proud and honored to help those clients achieve their aspirations, every time.

On December 11, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down Nasdaq's board diversity rules, which were designed to increase representation of women and minorities on corporate boards.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

On December 11, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down Nasdaq's board diversity rules, which were designed to increase representation of women and minorities on corporate boards. Since 2023, the rules have required Nasdaq-listed companies to have at least one woman, minority, or LGBTQ+ member on their boards and to report director diversity information each year.

In a split ruling, the en banc court concluded that the Securities and Exchange Commission exceeded its authority under the 1934 Securities Exchange Act in approving the diversity disclosure requirements. As mentioned in our last Securities Snapshot, the majority paid special attention to the purposes of the Act, noting that Nasdaq's proposed rule were "far removed" from the SEC's charge to approve stock exchange rules that promote "just and equitable principles of trade."

The court also invoked the major questions doctrine, which requires agencies like the SEC to have "clear congressional authorization" to exercise power over issues of major national significance. The SEC's approval of the rules, the court explained, implicated "staggering" economic and political significance. Accordingly, the court found nothing in the Act that gives the SEC the ability it purported to have to impose the diversity disclosures.

In response, a Nasdaq spokesperson said that while the exchange disagrees with the court's decision, it does not plan to appeal the ruling. The SEC followed with its own statement, noting that the agency was "reviewing the decision" and would determine appropriate next steps. Although the SEC could appeal, it is unlikely given the priorities of the incoming administration.

As Nasdaq-listed companies begin to gather their materials ahead of the 2025 proxy season, they should note that Wednesday's decision relieves them of the obligation to disclose metrics about their board diversity. However, as the Fifth Circuit acknowledged in its opinion, companies may voluntarily report information about their directors' social and demographic characteristics if they deem such information important to investors.

We will continue to monitor the implications of this decision as well as any further reporting guidance from the SEC and provide updates as they occur.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More