ARTICLE
18 June 2026

Rethinking FTC Order Duration: Kelley Drye Comment On X Corp.’s Petition

KD
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Contributor

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP is an AmLaw 200, Chambers ranked, full-service law firm of more than 350 attorneys and other professionals. For more than 180 years, Kelley Drye has provided legal counsel carefully connected to our client’s business strategies and has measured success by the real value we create.
Kelley Drye submitted a comment addressing X Corp.'s petition to modify the FTC's 2022 Decision and Order, raising fundamental questions about the Commission's decades-old approach to order duration.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
John E. Villafranco’s articles from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Privacy topic(s)

Kelley Drye submitted a comment this week in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s request for public input on X Corp.’s petition to reopen and set aside or modify the Commission’s 2022 Decision and Order over the company’s alleged use of account security data for targeted advertising. In its filing, the firm explains that X’s petition, while grounded in the specific facts of its case, raises broader concerns about the FTC’s longstanding approach to order duration, including the Commission’s default practice of imposing 20-year administrative orders and perpetual federal court orders. The comment notes that this framework has not been meaningfully revisited in decades, despite significant changes in markets, compliance practices, and technology.

The comment highlights how modern FTC orders can impose substantial and enduring compliance burdens that extend well beyond their remedial purpose. These obligations often require companies to maintain extensive internal governance structures, third-party audits, and detailed reporting systems long after they have demonstrated compliance. In addition, the comment observes that the FTC’s approach to order duration is increasingly out of step with other federal agencies, such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which typically impose shorter, more tailored order terms. Lengthy orders also risk locking companies into outdated compliance frameworks that may hinder innovation in rapidly evolving areas. The comment further notes that consent orders may divert resources away from emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, toward ongoing compliance efforts.

In light of these concerns, the comment encourages the Commission to adopt a more flexible and modern approach to order duration, including a default ten-year limit with tailored, provision-specific sunset periods where appropriate. You can read the full comment to the FTC here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More