- within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
- within Law Practice Management, Tax and Law Department Performance topic(s)
Summary for Founders:
- A general counsel ("GC") helps you prevent early legal mistakes that become expensive during financing, hiring and partnerships
- The biggest early risks usually come from ownership, structure, control and documentation, not one dramatic decision
- Intellectual property ("IP") problems start when early code, data and inventions are not assigned to the company in writing
- Entity and cap table mistakes can weaken limited liability and create diligence delays when investors review formation and equity history
- Early legal support focuses on practical guardrails like IP assignments, founder vesting, clear authority and organized records that investors can trust
Why General Counsel Matters Before Your Startup Starts Scaling
In the earliest stages of your startup, you are usually focused on the science, the technology and simply keeping the company alive. It is easy to overlook how quickly legal issues start to shape what you are building. Missteps at this stage can create long-term problems, including gaps in intellectual property ("IP") ownership or confusion about who actually controls key rights in the business.
A general counsel ("GC") helps founders avoid common legal mistakes that can threaten a new business. Early, targeted legal advice sets practical guardrails around ownership, structure and agreements so that avoidable risks do not accumulate in the background while you work. Instead of scrambling to fix issues later, you build on a legal foundation that investors can understand and trust.
This guide is for startup founders who want to understand the most common legal mistakes and how working with a GC, including a law firm that can function as an outside general counsel, can help avoid them, facilitating a strong foundation for growth.
Why Early Legal Strategy Matters in Life Sciences & Other Technology
Your company's most important assets often appear long before revenue. Bench data, early code, draft notebooks and informal research notes take shape during fast experiments and loose collaborations among founders, researchers and outside contributors.
That early work can become a diligence problem if the legal foundation is not built while the work is being created. Without clear ownership, assignment and confidentiality documentation, you may later struggle to show that the company owns and controls what it plans to commercialize. This can slow financing, hiring and partnerships when speed matters most.
Early legal strategy helps you:
- Protect core assets early by placing IP, research data, code and other valuable material under company ownership with appropriate protection.
- Reduce funding obstacles by aligning corporate records, contracts and filings so investors can review the business without encountering preventable red flags.
- Clarify contributions and expectations through founder agreements that document who owns what work and how future developments will be handled.
- Strengthen investor confidence by showing that assignments, governance terms and key agreements have been handled with care.
- Lower the risk of disputes among founders, researchers, independent contractors and other contributors over ownership or control.
Where Early-Stage Legal Risk Actually Comes From
Early-stage legal risk usually starts in ordinary operating moments, not big, dramatic decisions.
Ownership
Ownership issues arise when early work is never assigned to the company in writing. Founders write code, generate data and run experiments before signing any agreements and no one pauses to confirm who owns which contributions.
In legal terms, the individual who created the work still holds the rights until an assignment or some other legal document says otherwise. When investors review the business, the company may struggle to show that it holds full rights to the technology it plans to commercialize.
GC support introduces intellectual property assignment and confidentiality agreements early so that IP becomes a company asset rather than something that remains with individuals.
Structure
Structure problems begin when founders form an entity quickly or let the capitalization table take shape through informal conversations. Those early choices shape how equity is issued and tracked, how taxes apply and how easily investors can perform due diligence investigations on the business.
When records are incomplete or equity terms are inconsistent, the company can face preventable diligence delays and legal exposure once new investors review its formation and equity history.
General counsel helps founders put founder agreements, vesting terms and a structure in place that matches the company's financing plan and aligns with State laws and investor norms. That clarity makes the cap table easier to defend and reduces avoidable friction in funding rounds.
Control
You may assume that everyone will stay aligned, yet roles shift and commitments change as the company evolves. Without clear rules, a founder who steps back can retain a large stake that no longer reflects ongoing contribution. This creates tension inside the team and raises concerns for investors who want to see a stable, accountable leadership structure.
General Counsel support helps define decision-making rules and introduces vesting with appropriate cliffs so that control reflects contribution instead of early assumptions.
Documentation
Documentation problems develop when key agreements are not signed early or records live in email threads instead of a consistent system. Budgets are tight and work moves fast, so founders postpone paperwork until someone asks for it.
As the company grows, those gaps turn into delays during diligence or negotiations with investors and strategic partners.
A GC prepares practical agreements, such as nondisclosure agreements ("NDAs") and basic service contracts and helps you keep records organized so early documentation issues do not undermine investor confidence.
Common Legal Mistakes Startup Founders Make Early On
Failure to Lock Up IP Early
- Do you have written agreements assigning inventions to the company?
- Have you filed any patent applications that rely on confidential research?
- Have you presented slides or data in any public setting without an NDA?
- Are you relying on assumptions about ownership instead of documentation?
One of the most damaging early mistakes founders make is failing to secure intellectual property at the outset. Early code, research notes and experimental data take shape long before the company puts formal agreements in place and it is easy to assume that IP belongs to the business simply because the founding team created it.
Without written assignments or timely filings, the company may not legally own the assets it depends on. That gap becomes a serious issue the moment investors begin reviewing your structure and asking for a clear chain of title.
A single premature disclosure at a conference, in a pitch deck or during an informal discussion can affect patent timing and expose information that should have been treated as a trade secret. Once technical details enter a public space without a protection plan, competitors can use them and the company can lose control over work it expected to commercialize.
These disclosures have real consequences. Early public use or release of technical information can limit patent rights under U.S. rules and make it more difficult to prove that the company controls the IP at the heart of its business.
GC support helps your company treat IP as a core asset from the beginning. A GC develops a strategy for protecting early discoveries, coordinates ongoing invention reporting, prepares agreements that assign rights to the company and puts nondisclosure practices in place for collaborators and contractors.
Failure to Form and Use a Limited Liability Entity Correctly
- Do you sign contracts in your own name?
- Do you keep personal and company funds separate?
- Do you have a certificate of incorporation or formation supported by clear governance documents?
- Is anyone acting with unclear signing authority?
A second critical mistake founders make is delaying the formation of a limited-liability entity or treating it as a simple formality. It is common to assume that incorporation can wait until there is revenue, that a quick online filing is enough or that early work is still experimental and does not require a real business structure. These decisions feel harmless in the moment, yet they create real exposure as soon as the company begins to take on obligations.
In practice, this delay can lead to founders:
- Mixing personal and company funds
- Signing contracts in their own names
- Accepting obligations without any separation between the individual and the business
Without a functioning structure, there is no meaningful shield around personal assets. Courts can more easily disregard the corporate veil, treat the founder and the company as the same party and reach personal bank accounts or other property when a dispute arises.
The danger increases once the company begins entering vendor agreements, hiring employees or independent contractors and raising money from investors. Each new contract expands the company's obligations.
If the entity has not been formed correctly or if it is not used consistently, these obligations become harder to manage and can create costly disputes when investors or commercial partners begin reviewing the company's structure.
GC support helps your startup adopt a proper business structure early that fits its plan and use it the way State laws require. A GC helps your company to:
- Choose whether a limited liability company ("LLC") or a C corporation ("C Corp") aligns with its goals
- Prepare incorporation or formation documents
- Draft operating agreements or bylaws
- Set clear signing authority so contracts are executed in the company's name
- Maintain separateness in day-to-day operations so the company's structure remains reliable as it grows
Failure to Obtain Proper IP Assignments From Founders
- Have all founders signed IP assignment agreements?
- Was any code, data or research generated before formation without assignments?
- Do you maintain written records that link specific contributions to the company?
- Do you know who still holds rights to pre-formation work?
Another major mistake founders make is waiting too long to secure IP assignments from themselves and the rest of the founding team. Early work in a startup is rarely structured. People contribute ideas, code and experimental data as part of a shared push to move the company forward and no one stops to record who owns which pieces. It feels collaborative, but ownership may stay with individuals unless written agreements say otherwise.
You may assume that once the company is formed, every invention and draft created by any person automatically belongs to the entity. Legally, it does not. While IP created by formal employees is generally the property of the employer, it is always wise to have in place confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with employees.
For independent contractors and vendors, any IP created before an assignment agreement is signed remains with the person who produced it. If founder agreements are missing or incomplete, you end up with fragmented ownership of core technology instead of a clean chain of title that investors can rely on.
This becomes serious when a founder or key contributor leaves. Even in a smooth departure, that person may still own pre-assignment research, code or datasets. The company can then find itself unable to file patents, negotiate licenses or advance a product unilaterally because essential work is still tied to an individual rather than the entity.
Investors look closely at these issues. During diligence, they review assignment chains, founder agreements and related documents to confirm that the company owns its IP. If they see missing signatures or unclear ownership, they often pause the process until the gaps are corrected. Fixing those gaps later can take weeks and may require negotiations with former founders, which introduces delay, expense and avoidable risk.
GC support helps your startup protect its IP position before these problems arise. A GC helps your company to:
- Prepare and implement IP assignment agreements for founders and early contributors
- Prepare and implement confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements for employees
- Coordinate ongoing invention reporting
- Maintain records that connect specific contributions to the company's ownership
These practices help your company prevent small gaps from turning into costly structural issues during funding or commercialization.
Failure to Secure IP Rights from Contractors and Vendors
- Do your vendor or contractor agreements include written IP assignment terms?
- Are labs, contract research organizations ("CROs") or developers reusing their own background IP without restrictions?
- Are confidentiality terms clear?
- Do outside contributors control datasets or methods your company depends on?
In many early-stage companies, the people doing the early work are not always on your payroll. Developers write code, CROs run assays, academic labs generate data and independent contractors build early prototypes. Much of your company's value moves through contributors who are not part of the founding team.
These contributors bring their own tools with them. If your agreements do not assign rights to your company or restrict the reuse of proprietary methods, then ownership of essential work can stay with the vendor instead of with the entity you are building.
You feel the impact when real deals begin. A contractor who still owns deliverables can refuse to sign an assignment. A lab can exercise publication rights that disrupt patent timing. A CRO can claim control over data that investors thought you owned. These issues create friction at the exact moment you need momentum in a financing, a collaboration or a licensing discussion.
Outsourcing is unavoidable, but ownership cannot be left open. Every agreement with a contractor, lab or CRO should include:
- Clear IP assignment terms
- Confidentiality obligations
- Limits on the reuse of proprietary methods or background IP
GC support helps your company lock these protections in before work starts. A GC helps your startup to:
- Draft and negotiate vendor contracts and statements of work
- Secure IP assignment from outside contributors
- Keep clear records of who created what and how it flows into company ownership
When these safeguards are in place, your company can build on outsourced work without worrying about who controls the rights behind it.
Failure to Align Equity With Actual Contributions (No Vesting)
- Does every founder have a written vesting schedule?
- Are there founders who hold equity but no longer contribute?
- Does the company have a mechanism to recover unvested shares?
- Would an investor see alignment between ownership and contribution?
Early momentum may lead founders to divide equity before anyone knows who will stay engaged or how responsibilities will evolve. Everyone assumes the commitment will remain equal as the company grows, yet long-term roles are almost always different from what the team imagined at the beginning.
In practice, founders step back, availability changes or early collaborators move on while still holding a meaningful percentage of the company. Without vesting, those shares stay with the person who left. The founders who remain carry more of the work while holding a smaller share of the upside, which creates tension and makes future planning harder.
A GC helps your company to:
- Prepare founder agreements that introduce vesting
- Establish a mechanism to recover unearned shares
- Structure ownership in a way that supports hiring and future investment
These steps help your company preserve fairness, maintain flexibility and present a cap table investors can trust.
Giving Too Much Power and Control to Early Investors
- Do early investors have consent rights that apply to everyday decisions?
- Does any investor hold blocking rights over financings?
- Is board authority aligned with the company's long-term plan?
- Do governance terms match the size of the investment?
In early fundraising cycles, it can feel necessary to accept whatever terms an investor proposes just to keep the company alive. Founders may agree to broad consent rights or board control that exceeds the investor's contribution. These terms may look routine, but in practice they can give an early investor more influence over the company's direction than the founding team anticipated.
When an investor holds wide control rights, everyday decisions like hiring key employees, adjusting technical priorities, entering contracts or making budget choices may require investor approval. Over time, this slows the team's ability to execute and can create friction between the judgment of the founders and the authority of the investor.
GC support helps your company avoid granting more control than necessary by working with you to:
- Review term sheets and investment agreements
- Assess whether proposed governance rights match the size and purpose of the investment
- Explain how specific control rights work in day-to-day operations
- Negotiate for a governance framework that protects investors without limiting the founding team's ability to lead
These steps help your company maintain control, preserve flexibility and build a governance structure that supports long-term growth.
How General Counsel Supports Startups From Garage to Marketplace
GC support evolves with your company. In each stage of growth, counsel provides the structure, documents and legal insight that help you move forward without carrying risks that are easy to prevent early.
How a GC Supports You in the Formation Stage
In the beginning, everything moves fast. People contribute ideas, build early versions of the product and make commitments before the company has any formal structure. A GC helps you pull that early work into a focused foundation by:
- Forming the entity
- Documenting each founder's role
- Putting IP assignments in place
- Aligning ownership records with the contributions your team is already making
These early steps give the company a clear structure that protects its assets and reduces the chance of painful equity or ownership disputes surfacing later when you are trying to grow.
How a GC Supports You in the Growth Stage
As your startup enters growth, legal support shifts toward the agreements and operational issues that shape your daily work. A GC:
- Drafts and negotiates contracts with vendors, labs and contractors
- Prepares employee documentation where appropriate
- Sets up practical compliance practices so confidential information and trade secrets stay protected
These steps secure the work being produced around you and allow your team to focus more of its time on product and research instead of managing preventable legal issues.
How a GC Supports You in the Funding Stage
During funding rounds, legal support becomes central to how investors assess your company. A GC:
- Helps you negotiate terms of the financing
- Reviews the cap table
- Checks that earlier agreements align with how the company presents its structure
- Prepares investment documents so investor rights and founder control stay in balance
This work reduces risk during diligence and gives investors a clearer view of how the company is organized, which supports raising money with fewer delays and fewer surprises.
How a GC Helps in the Sustainable Stage
Over time, your company faces more partners, more data obligations and more decisions that create legal risk if they are not managed carefully. Ongoing GC support helps you anticipate disputes and regulatory changes instead of reacting to them.
A GC establishes operating agreements, board processes and internal policies that reduce personal liability for founders and protect the "corporate veil", i.e. the separation between the liabilities of the company and the personal responsibilities of officers and directors. With these structures in place, your company can operate on firmer ground and avoid the preventable issues that tend to appear as a business matures.
Conclusion
With Crowley Law, your company works with an "outside GC" who becomes part of your long-term team, not an outside voice brought in only when a crisis appears. We help you protect IP, set a reliable business structure, negotiate agreements that support growth and prepare for funding in ways that reduce avoidable risk.
FAQs
| When should I bring in a GC vs working with outside legal counselor on specific projects? | Work with a legal counselor on specific projects when you have clear, one-off needs like formation, a single contract review or a founder equity setup. Bring in a GC when legal work becomes ongoing and connected across hiring, equity, contracts and IP. A GC helps keep decisions consistent, keeps documents aligned and reduces cleanup work during diligence. If you are making legal calls every few weeks that affect ownership, control or obligations, a GC model usually fits better. |
| What are the first few documents a GC will usually prioritize for an early-stage startup and why? | A GC usually starts with documents that lock down ownership and reduce future disputes: entity formation documents, founder IP assignment and confidentiality agreements, founder equity and vesting paperwork, contractor and vendor agreements with clear IP assignment terms, a nondisclosure agreement ("NDA") for early discussions and basic governance records that set signing authority and approvals. These documents matter early because they prevent unclear ownership, protect the cap table and make it easier to raise money and sign partners later. When these are handled first, the rest of the legal stack becomes easier to build. |
| How do I confirm the company actually owns its IP, including pre-formation work, code and data? | Start by listing what matters most: core code, key datasets, research notebooks and patentable inventions. Then list everyone who contributed, including founders, employees, contractors and any lab or contract research organization ("CRO"). For each person, confirm there is a signed agreement that assigns the work to the company and covers the time period when the work was created, especially anything done before the entity existed. If you cannot match a key asset to a signed assignment, treat ownership as incomplete until you fix it. |
| What is the fastest way to fix missing IP assignments from founders, employees and contractors without reopening old disputes? | Keep the cleanup narrow and practical. Identify the missing assignments, prepare short documents that assign past work to the company and set a clear signature deadline tied to a business need like financing or a partner request. Use a consistent message that the goal is record cleanup, not renegotiation of old issues. For contractors and vendors, make sure the assignment covers deliverables, data and improvements so there is no gap. If someone has left, the same approach can still work, but it often takes more careful outreach and clearer documentation. |
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.