Pennsylvania Federal Court To Issue Decision On FTC Non-Compete Ban Challenge By July 23

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
While the two federal actions in Texas challenging the FTC's non-compete ban have garnered much of the attention to date, a challenge of the FTC's rule brought by a small tree trimming business...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

While the two federal actions in Texas challenging the FTC's non-compete ban have garnered much of the attention to date, a challenge of the FTC's rule brought by a small tree trimming business in Pennsylvania is now in the spot light as the federal court there has indicated that it will issue a ruling by July 23rd.

Earlier this month, the Plaintiff ATS filed its Motion to Stay the Effective Date of the Non-Compete Rule in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The FTC then sought additional time to brief Plaintiff's motion and yesterday the Court issued the following briefing schedule:

THE FTC SHALL FILE ITS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO ATSS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF NO. 10) ON OR BY JUNE 4, 2024;

ATS SHALL FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION ON OR BY JUNE 25, 2024;

SHOULD THE COURT DEEM A HEARING ON ATSS MOTION NECESSARY, A TENTATIVE HEARING DATE IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 2024 AT 12:00 P.M.

THE COURT WILL ISSUE A DECISION ON THE MERITS OF PLAINTIFF ATSS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF NO. 10) BY JULY 23, 2024.

The Texas federal court in the Ryan case has indicated that it will issue a decision on the Plaintiffs' challenge of the non-compete ban by July 3, 2024.

Accordingly, we may be looking at differing decisions depending upon how the courts' rule, leading to further employer confusion and consternation with the looming September 4th effective date of the FTC's non-compete ban.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More