ARTICLE
10 August 2026

Does An Expiration Date Actually Mean That The Sale Ends On That Date?

FK
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

Contributor

Frankfurt Kurnit provides high quality legal services to clients in many industries and disciplines worldwide. With leading practices in entertainment, advertising, IP, technology, litigation, corporate, estate planning, charitable organizations, professional responsibility and other areas — Frankfurt Kurnit helps clients face challenging legal issues and meet their goals with efficient solutions.
Safeway faces a class action lawsuit over its rewards program pricing practices, with plaintiffs alleging that member-only prices advertised with 'Thru' dates mislead consumers into believing sales are time-limited when they actually continue indefinitely. After an initial dismissal, a federal court has now allowed the case to proceed on these deceptive advertising claims.
United States Consumer Protection
Jeff Greenbaum’s articles from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz are most popular:
  • within Consumer Protection topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Retail & Leisure industries
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz are most popular:
  • within Government, Public Sector and Strategy topic(s)

Members of Safeway's rewards program get members-only prices on various products offered for sale in the store. A group of Safeway's rewards program members sued the company, alleging that its member pricing is deceptive. 

In the plaintiffs' first amended complaint, they argued that it was deceptive for Safeway to promote the members-only prices as special, sale prices, since those prices are available for free, to all members. The court dismissed that complaint, finding that “the higher non-member prices are indisputably real prices charged to non-members.”

The plaintiffs then filed a second amended complaint, alleging that the member pricing was deceptive because it was falsely advertised as a time-limited sale. On the shelf tags, the prices are advertised as being valid “Thru” a certain date. After that date, the plaintiffs allege, Safeway just continues selling the product at a discounted price. (This allegation was actually included in the first amended complaint, but wasn't addressed in the court's first decision dismissing the case.)

Safeway moved to dismiss again, arguing that the “Thru” date isn't deceptive, because it doesn't communicate what happens after that date. This time, however, the court was not persuaded, and allowed the case to continue. The court held that the plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged that consumers may be misled into believing that the “Thru” date is the date that the sale expires. 

Tempest v. Safeway, 2026 WL 2258433 (N.D. Cal. 2026).

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More