ARTICLE
24 March 2026

Thirteen AGs Sue Major Installment Lender Over Add-On Packing; Former CFPB Attorneys Lead The Charge

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
A bipartisan coalition of thirteen state AGs filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York against one of the nation's largest non-bank installment lenders, alleging a scheme...
United States Consumer Protection
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

A bipartisan coalition of thirteen state AGs filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York against one of the nation's largest non-bank installment lenders, alleging a scheme to pack consumer loans with undisclosed add-on products. The action seeks restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, and injunctive relief.

The complaint alleges the lender marketed loans with "clear, upfront terms" but bundled optional credit insurance and membership products into loan balances at closing. Because the products were single-premium, the states allege that the full cost was financed into the principal, inflating both the loan amount and total interest. The states allege employees controlled the closing screen and rushed borrowers through documents to close the deal.

What makes this action notable is who is bringing it. Several attorneys on the complaint are former CFPB enforcement lawyers now in senior state AG roles. The lead attorney for one plaintiff state was the Bureau's fourth employee, helped draft the CFPA at Treasury, and was recruited in 2017 to build the nation's first "mini-CFPB," which has since secured over $374 million in relief. The lead attorney for another plaintiff state also served at the Bureau. The complaint reads accordingly: its use of internal company documents and its focus on process design and compensation incentives mirror the enforcement approach these attorneys developed at the federal level.

Putting It Into Practice: Lenders offering financed add-on products should review their closing process design, compensation structures, product loss ratios, and TILA characterization of add-ons. The states are treating each as independent evidence of unlawful conduct. With experienced CFPB enforcement attorneys now running these cases from state AG offices, companies should expect state-led actions that match the Bureau's historical rigor. Companies selling ancillary products in connection with consumer credit should evaluate their compliance posture now.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More