ARTICLE
13 October 2020

The ‘High' Court Denies Review Of Federal Overtime Case Involving Cannabis Employees

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With approximately 1,000 lawyers across 17 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
As you might recall from our previous post, The 10th Circuit Grants Re-leaf to Workers Seeking Overtime Under the FLSA...
United States Cannabis & Hemp
Seyfarth Shaw LLP are most popular:
  • within Compliance and Consumer Protection topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Healthcare industries

As you might recall from our previous post, The 10th Circuit Grants Re-leaf to Workers Seeking Overtime Under the FLSA, the 10th Circuit held that cannabis employers are not immune from federal overtime laws even though the cannabis sector is illegal under federal law.

The employer in Robert Kenney v. Helix TCS, Inc., sought to clear the haze that the 10th Circuit's ruling created with respect to the "confusion, conflict, and lack of uniformity between state and federal law regarding federal rights and protections accorded" to employees in the cannabis industry by filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court.

While the Appellate court found that cannabis employees can bring suit under the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) because employers are not excused from complying with federal law just because their business practices are federally prohibited, in its petition, Helix argued that this notion seemed at odds with the principle that the federal government does not "extend federal benefits to those associated with the marijuana industry."

The High court denied review. For now, it appears that cannabis employees can seek redress for federal labor law violations under the FLSA. But even if the court had ruled that the FLSA did not apply, cannabis employers still need to comply with state labor laws. Thus, employers must ensure their practices are compliant in their relevant jurisdictions. Otherwise, they might find themselves involved in high stakes litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More