ARTICLE
2 March 2018

Searching Questions About Drones And The Fourth Amendment

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
It's only a matter of time before the Supreme Court will have to grapple with the vexing constitutional issues raised with increasing drone usage.
United States Transport

It's only a matter of time before the Supreme Court will have to grapple with the vexing constitutional issues raised with increasing drone usage.

Both recreational and commercial drone use has skyrocketed since the United States Congress mandated the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2012 to safely integrate drones into national airspace. As a result, the FAA has loosened regulations, making it easier to operate drones commercially. Not only are drones seeing increased commercial usage, but a growing number of government agencies are also turning to drones to assist with law enforcement and public safety. With this increased use in commerce and public safety comes an increase in privacy claims against both state actors and private individuals and companies.

Legally, two basic regimes operate to protect individual privacy rights: (1) traditional tort claims, which may be used to protect people from non-governmental actors; and (2) the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects the public from governmental invasions of privacy. 

The Fourth Amendment protects private citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This constitutional protection provides, in relevant part, that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated." The touchstone of Fourth Amendment analysis is whether a "search" occurred. Except in limited circumstances, warrantless searches violate the Fourth Amendment and evidence collected during the search cannot be admitted in criminal proceedings.

It's only a matter of time before the Supreme Court will have to grapple with the vexing constitutional issues raised with increasing drone usage. When it does, its focus will likely be on whether the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information collected.  However, in time, the proliferation of drone technology will alter how courts apply the Fourth Amendment. Whatever novel approach the Court may develop to protect privacy in the digital age, while preserving the Fourth Amendment's traditional check on governmental power, will undoubtedly be influenced by the impact the drone revolution is expected to have on society.

Read the full article by Kevin Moon and Brandon Franklin in California Lawyer here.

A Q&A with Kevin Moon on this topic from UAS Magazine can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More