ARTICLE
25 March 2021

Further Developments Regarding Video Conference Hearings At The EPO

JA
J A Kemp LLP

Contributor

J A Kemp is a leading firm of European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. We combine independent thinking with collective excellence in all that we do. The technical and legal knowledge that we apply to the protection of our clients’ patents is outstanding in its breadth and depth. With around 100 science and technology graduates in the firm, including 50 PhDs, no area of science or technology is outside our scope. Our Patent Attorneys have collective in-depth expertise in patent law and procedure in every country of the world. The team of professionals who advise our clients on trade mark and design matters have backgrounds in major international law firms and hold qualifications as Chartered UK Trade Mark Attorneys, Solicitors and European Trade Mark Professional Representatives. Dedicated to this specialist area of intellectual property protection, the team has the expertise and resources to protect trade marks and designs in any market worldwide.
We recently reported that the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal has scheduled a hearing date of 28 May 2021 for the referral regarding the legality of video conference oral proceedings without the consent of one or more of the parties.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

We recently reported  that the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal has scheduled a hearing date of 28 May 2021 for the referral regarding the legality of video conference oral proceedings without the consent of one or more of the parties.

The EPO has today announced (see here  and here) that it will continue to hold oral proceedings by video conference as under current practice, i.e. "without requiring explicit agreement of the parties". This outcome is perhaps not altogether surprising under the circumstances: the EPO has explained that "avoiding a further delay in access to justice is a priority". By contrast, had the EPO suspended all hearings scheduled to take place by video conference "without consent", the already lengthy backlog caused by the pandemic would be extended yet further. 

Separately, the Administrative Council of the EPO has approved  an amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. In particular new Article 15a allows the Boards of Appeal to hold oral proceedings by video conference "either upon request by a party or of its own motion", and will come into force on 1 April 2021. This amendment puts into effect the existing practice of the Boards of Appeal, whereby hearings are being held by video conference at the Boards "own motion" (i.e. without the consent of the parties).

In view of these developments, it seems that the EPO, at least, is relatively confident that the Enlarged Board of Appeal will not conclude that video conference oral proceedings must have the consent of all parties to be legal. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More