ARTICLE
16 November 2020

EPO Oppositions Oral Proceedings By Video Conference Will Become Mandatory From 4 January 2021

D
Dehns

Contributor

Founded in 1920, Dehns is one of Europe’s largest full service intellectual property firms, with offices in London, Munich, Oslo, Oxford, Bristol, Brighton, Manchester and Birmingham.

In addition to obtaining patent, trade mark and design protection around the world, our services also extend to IP management consulting and dispute resolution. Dehns attorneys have expertise in a wide range of technologies across the engineering, chemistry and biotechnology sectors.

Our clients include private inventors, universities and research institutions, start-ups and SMEs as well as large multinational corporations. We are firmly focussed on delivering clear advice and valuable results at a competitive cost.

Dehns’ straightforward, business-oriented approach combined with technical excellence has made us leaders in our field and we are proud of our top tier rankings.

In order to clear the backlog of cancelled/postponed opposition hearings due to COVID19, the EPO has issued a Decision that from 4 January 2021 until at least 15 Sept 2021 any opposition OPs...
United Kingdom Strategy

In order to clear the backlog of cancelled/postponed opposition hearings due to COVID19, the EPO has issued a Decision that from 4 January 2021 until at least 15 Sept 2021 any opposition OPs will be held by video conference (VICO) without requiring consent from all parties. 

Unlike the current practice, parties will not be able to object to the hearing going ahead by VICO without serious reasons.  Examples of serious reasons given by the EPO are:

“reasons relating to a participant to the oral proceedings as an individual (e.g. a proven visual impairment that prevents a representative from following oral proceedings on screen) and reasons related to the nature and subject matter of the proceedings (e.g. where they involve the demonstration or inspection of an object where the haptic features are essential, to the extent that this is possible in accordance with the applicable provisions). Sweeping objections against the reliability of videoconferencing technology or the non-availability of videoconferencing equipment will, as a rule, not qualify as serious reasons in this regard.”

Further details can be found here:

https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/president-notices/archive/20201110.html

https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/information-epo/archive/20201110.html

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More