ARTICLE
15 March 2021

How Will Board Of Appeal React To Withdrawal Of Request For Referral To Enlarged Board Of Appeal?

JA
J A Kemp LLP

Contributor

J A Kemp is a leading firm of European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. We combine independent thinking with collective excellence in all that we do. The technical and legal knowledge that we apply to the protection of our clients’ patents is outstanding in its breadth and depth. With around 100 science and technology graduates in the firm, including 50 PhDs, no area of science or technology is outside our scope. Our Patent Attorneys have collective in-depth expertise in patent law and procedure in every country of the world. The team of professionals who advise our clients on trade mark and design matters have backgrounds in major international law firms and hold qualifications as Chartered UK Trade Mark Attorneys, Solicitors and European Trade Mark Professional Representatives. Dedicated to this specialist area of intellectual property protection, the team has the expertise and resources to protect trade marks and designs in any market worldwide.
As reported earlier here, Board of Appeal 3.5.02 in appeal case T1807/15 indicated in the minutes of oral proceedings that it would refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal concerning the...
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

As reported earlier here, Board of Appeal 3.5.02 in appeal case T1807/15 indicated in the minutes of oral proceedings that it would refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal concerning the legality of holding oral proceedings by video conference without the consent of the parties. The planned referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal followed a request by a party to the proceedings, which was made at the start of oral proceedings on 8 February 2021. However, doubt has been cast on whether the referral will in fact proceed, since the party in question has now withdrawn the request for a referral.

The Board of Appeal has not yet issued its decision following the oral proceedings, and as a result the referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal has not yet been formally made. Article 112(2) EPC states that "...the Board of Appeal shall, during proceedings on a case and either of its own motion or following a request from a party to the appeal, refer any question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if it considers that a decision is required...". The Board of Appeal therefore retains the power to refer the question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of its own motion, despite the request being withdrawn by the party. 

Before the request was withdrawn, third party observations had been filed by the Institute of Professional Representatives before the EPO (epi). The third party observations included a request to expedite the referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal and contained proposed wording for the questions to be referred. It is therefore evident that there is wider interest in the Enlarged Board of Appeal considering whether oral proceedings by video conference can be held without the consent of the parties. It is possible that the Board of Appeal may take the broader issue of public interest into account when deciding whether or not to make the referral of its own motion. 

It will be interesting to see how the Board of Appeal reacts to this unexpected and rather unusual development.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More