The NYU Stern Center for Sustainable Business published a report in January 2021 finding that US corporate Boards suffer from inadequate expertise in financially material ESG matters such as human rights.
In a survey of 1,188 Fortune 100 Board directors, only 18 (or 1.5%) had any experience or credentials relating to human rights. Findings amongst Board directors outside the US are unlikely to be very different. The Stern report found limited expertise across the full range of ESG risks (beyond human rights to climate change, water scarcity, pollution, #metoo, #blacklivesmatter, employee diversity, cybersecurity and bribery and corruption) and questioned whether "today's Boards [are] fit for today's challenges and opportunities".
In this Blog Post, we discuss what Boards should do to address this capacity deficit.
The Stern report advocates that the Board must:
- understand the material ESG issues for the company, "today and tomorrow";
- understand the perspective of critical stakeholders, such as employees, civil society and long-term investors, on ESG issues and ensure their concerns are built into the culture and business strategy of the company;
- diversify to include people with expertise in those material issues;
- ensure that the company has a "sustainability strategy that is embedded in the company's business strategy and that KPIs are developed that are aligned with key reporting standards, that are built into work plans and compensation and that are third party assured";
- ask their executive team to report on the financial impact of their ESG investments in a comprehensive way, including intangible and tangible benefits such as risk avoidance, employee retention and operational efficiency; and
- reflect the new ESG reality in the Board culture, their own expertise and through proactive engagement with management on its sustainability strategy and with key stakeholders.
Norges Bank Investment Management helpfully elaborates on these recommendations from an investor perspective, so far as human rights issues are concerned, in their Human Rights Expectations document, which we covered in a previous Blog Post.
Board representation aside, it is important to note that companies are increasingly looking to systematically integrate external expertise to promote constructive exchanges on ESG issues, to better understand different perspectives and to help address conflicting goals.
Originally Published 19 February, 2021
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.