US Private Fund Adviser Rules Overturned

M
Macfarlanes

Contributor

We are a distinctive law firm, combining expertise, agility, and a client-centric culture to address the most challenging legal demands and foster innovation. Our firm is structured around the needs of our clients, with whom we build long-lasting relationships, tackling complex issues in key practice areas.

Our approach is focused and deliberate. We assist clients with major transactions, including M&A, real estate, and financial products; handle significant litigation and investigations; and provide comprehensive private capital advice, particularly through our leading private client practice.

With offices in London and Brussels, and a strong international network, we collaborate with top lawyers globally to deliver the highest level of service. Our firm’s human-sized culture emphasizes long-term careers, fostering a cohesive, entrepreneurial environment where every team member can thrive.

The Private Fund Adviser Rules adopted by the SEC in August 2023 (and summarised in our September note) were overturned on 5 June 2024 by a US appeals court.
United Kingdom Finance and Banking

The Private Fund Adviser Rules adopted by the SEC in August 2023 (and summarised in our September note) were overturned on 5 June 2024 by a US appeals court. We observed in the February 2024 edition of our Private Funds Radar that the Rules were being challenged by the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) and other industry groups, principally on the basis that the SEC did not have the power to make the Rules.

In its judgement, the court agreed, stating "[t]he [SEC] has exceeded its statutory authority . . . no part of [the Rules] can stand".

While the Rules largely did not apply to non-US sponsors of non-US funds, this outcome will still be welcomed by non-US sponsors who fundraise in the US. Had the Rules stood, those sponsors may have found it beneficial or even necessary to comply with the Rules voluntarily to facilitate their US fundraising efforts.

It will be interesting to see how the SEC responds to the judgement (and in particular whether it will appeal to the US Supreme Court); we will continue to monitor developments in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More