ARTICLE
12 October 2026

Company Law – Directors Fined For Failing To Complete UK IDV Requirements

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
The Insolvency Service has brought its first prosecutions under new identity verification requirements, targeting three individuals who acted as company directors without complying with mandatory verification rules...
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

First prosecutions brought by the Insolvency Service against individuals for acting as directors without having verified their identity

Three individuals have been successfully prosecuted and fined by the Insolvency Service for acting as directors without having verified their identity in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

Under changes made to the CA 2006 by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), it is an offence for an individual to act as a director of a company unless their identity has been verified. For more details on the identity verification (IDV) regime, see our snapshot here (and on the ECCTA in general, our blog here).

Two of the three individuals who have been prosecuted had continued to act as directors of companies without having verified their identity. The third individual had verified their own identity, but was fined for allowing one of the other individuals to continue to act as a director of their company without having complied with the IDV requirements. Under the CA 2006, where an individual acts as a director without being verified, an offence is committed not only by that individual but also by the company in relation to which the individual purports to act and by the officers of the company.

The Insolvency Service said that the prosecutions were brought only after multiple efforts had been made by Companies House to try to secure compliance. Companies House – who referred the matter to the Insolvency Service for prosecution – commented that these cases “send a clear message that [IDV] is not optional”.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More