ARTICLE
5 February 2025

Policy In Practice: Litigation Funding In England And Wales (Podcast)

M
Macfarlanes LLP

Contributor

We are a London-based law firm, built and shaped around the needs of our clients. Our blend of expertise, agility and culture means we have the flexibility to meet our clients’ most challenging demands and to champion innovation. We operate in three broad areas: assisting clients with their major transactions, from complex M&A and real estate transactions to the creation of sophisticated financial products; aiding our clients with their most consequential litigation and investigations; and advising on all aspects of our clients’ private capital needs, working with asset managers, family offices and individual entrepreneurs. The scope of our services is distinct, and we are a foremost firm in each of these areas.
In the latest episode of the policy in practice podcast, David Gauke, Malcolm Hitching, and James Popperwell discuss litigation funding in England and Wales...
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the latest episode of the policy in practice podcast, David Gauke, Malcolm Hitching, and James Popperwell discuss litigation funding in England and Wales, including the impact of legal rulings, the ongoing Civil Justice Council (CJC) review, and whether or not further regulation might be needed to preserve access to justice while protecting consumers.

They cover:

  • the impact of the PACCAR ruling on litigation funding agreements;
  • the CJC's review of the litigation funding sector in England and Wales; and
  • whether or not further regulation might provide relevant protections for consumers.

If you would like more information or want to discuss any of the topics in this podcast, please get in touch with David, Malcolm or James.

Summary

In this latest policy in practice podcast episode, David Gauke, head of public policy at Macfarlanes, is joined by finance partner Malcolm Hitching and litigation partner James Popperwell to discuss the ongoing review of litigation funding in the UK and its implications for the legal landscape.

The conversation begins by examining the impact of the PACCAR ruling in 2023, which has caused significant uncertainty in the litigation funding market. They discuss how the ruling affects the enforceability of litigation funding agreements, particularly Damages-Based Agreements (DBAs), and how this has led to a reduction in available funding and access to justice for claimants.

The conversation moves to the CJC's review, which is focused on assessing whether the current funding framework leads to harm or unfairness. They explore concerns regarding unmeritorious claims, the transparency of funding agreements, and the influence of funders on the litigation process.

Lastly, they discuss wherher or not clearer regulation and consumer protection is needed to ensure fair access to justice for non-commercial claimants. The speakers emphasise the importance of balancing consumer safeguards with preserving the freedom of contract for commercial parties.

Originally published 29 January 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.



Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More