ARTICLE
18 November 2025

New Administrative Fines Regulation For Competition Violations Enters Into Force

P
Paksoy

Contributor

Paksoy is an independent full-service law firm in Istanbul renowned for its expertise in international legal matters, providing legal services in cross-border transactions and dispute resolution work. With over 60 lawyers, 10 partners we are able to provide a wide range of services to our clients from around the world across the sectors and industries, from healthcare, energy and natural resources to infrastructure, construction, real estate, financial services, technology, media, telecoms. Paksoy provides legal services and specialist input (e.g., antitrust, tax, compliance, employment) to domestic and global clients, financial institutions, private and public companies, foreign investors and private equity funds.

The Regulation on Administrative Fines for Restrictive Agreements, Concerted Practices, Decisions, and Abuse of Dominance, which governs the administrative fines issued by the Turkish Competition Board (the "Board") for competition law violations, has been renewed and published in the Official Gazette on 27 December 2024 and numbered 32765.
Turkey Antitrust/Competition Law
Paksoy are most popular:
  • within International Law topic(s)

The Regulation on Administrative Fines for Restrictive Agreements, Concerted Practices, Decisions, and Abuse of Dominance ("New Fines Regulation") introduces significant changes to the framework for determining administrative fines for competition infringements. This legal alert provides an overview of the key changes introduced and their potential implications:

1. Elimination of the Predetermined Base Fines

One of the key changes introduced by the New Fines Regulation is the removal of the old provision where the base fine rate was determined solely on the basis of the types of violations categorized as "cartel" and "other violations". Under the former regulation, fines were set within specific ranges of turnover of undertakings, i.e. between 2% and 4% for cartels and between 0.05% and 3% for other violations.

The New Fines Regulation abolished these predefined ranges and granted the Board discretion in determining the applicable base fines for each violation based on the severity of the violation and the nature of the harm caused. In this respect, the initial fine rate will be determined by the Board by taking into consideration, in particular, the gravity of the damage realized or likely to be realized due to the violation and whether the nature of the violation is explicit and/or severe (i.e. a hard core violation).

2. Calculation Method of the Base Fine

The New Fines Regulation introduces a more detailed and tiered approach in determination of the administrative fine based on duration. Accordingly, the base penalty rate will be increased in line with the length of the violation. The increases in fines depending on the length of the violation are as follows:

  • 1–2 years: 20% increase
  • 2–3 years: 40% increase
  • 3–4 years: 60% increase
  • 4–5 years: 80% increase
  • Over 5 years: 100% increase

3. Changes in Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

It is noted that the aggravating factors have been revised and expanded under the New Fines Regulation. Accordingly, in general, aggravating factors include (i) repetition of violations under Articles 4 and/or 6 of the Act No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition, (ii) continuation of the violation after the notification of the investigation decision, (iii) existence of decisive influence in the violation, and (iv) violation of the confidentiality obligation under the relevant provisions of the Settlement Regulation. Additionally, if more than one aggravating factor is present, the resulting increase will be cumulative and applied to the base fine rate.

As in the old regulation, the New Fines Regulation lists mitigating factors in the form of examples. Accordingly, the penalty may be reduced if it is proven by the undertaking that (i) except for the fulfilment of its legal obligations, the undertaking assisted the on-site examination by providing physical and/or technical facilities, or by spontaneously providing additional information or documents relevant to the subject of the examination, enabling the investigation to be completed more quickly or effectively, (ii) the violation was coerced by other undertakings, (iii) there was limited participation by the undertaking in the violation, (iv) the share of the activities subject to the violation in the annual gross revenues is low, (v) foreign sales revenues are included in the annual gross revenues used to calculate the administrative fine.

4. Administrative Fines to be imposed on Managers and Employees

The New Fines Regulation defines decisive influence as having an indispensable function in the occurrence and/or perpetuation of the violation. Accordingly, in the event that an administrative fine is imposed on an undertaking under the New Fines Regulation, the managers or employees of the undertaking who had a decisive influence on the violation will be subject to an administrative fine up to five percent of the fine imposed on the undertaking. With the removal of the distinction between cartel and other violations, the fines to be imposed on managers and employees within the scope of decisive influence are now standardized.

The New Fines Regulation, published in the Official Gazette, can be accessed here.

Originally published 13 January 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More