Privacy Law and Privacy Regulations

California businesses face mounting legal exposure under a 1967 anti-wiretapping statute now weaponized against common website tracking tools. When cookies, pixels, and analytics fire before visitors consent, repeat plaintiffs are demanding $5,000 per violation—and most companies don't realize their sites are vulnerable. What technical steps can meaningfully reduce your risk, and what should you do if a demand letter arrives?

Competition authorities across Europe are expanding their digital evidence-gathering capabilities, including access to remotely stored data, raising critical questions about the balance between investigative powers and fundamental rights protections. Recent decisions demonstrate both the broad scope of these authorities' powers and the potential for significant interference with privacy rights when accessing personal and professional devices.

Employers and tech companies face real litigation risk when they process voice data in ways that could be used to identify individuals, even if they never actually use the data for that purpose.

California businesses face mounting legal exposure under a 1967 anti-wiretapping statute now weaponized against common website tracking tools. When cookies, pixels, and analytics fire before visitors consent, repeat plaintiffs are demanding $5,000 per violation—and most companies don't realize their sites are vulnerable. What technical steps can meaningfully reduce your risk, and what should you do if a demand letter arrives?

The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council has proposed a comprehensive framework establishing contractor obligations for safeguarding Controlled Unclassified Information, introducing new security requirements based on NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 and mandatory incident reporting within 72 hours.

Competition authorities across Europe are expanding their digital evidence-gathering capabilities, including access to remotely stored data, raising critical questions about the balance between investigative powers and fundamental rights protections. Recent decisions demonstrate both the broad scope of these authorities' powers and the potential for significant interference with privacy rights when accessing personal and professional devices.