ARTICLE
1 September 2026

TPS Work Authorization Update: How The One Big Beautiful Bill Act Shortens 540-Day EAD Extensions

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

Recent legislative, regulatory, and litigation developments have affected Temporary Protected Status (TPS)-related employment authorization, with implications for ongoing work authorization.
Worldwide Immigration
Kathryn Schababerle’s articles from Greenberg Traurig, LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries
Greenberg Traurig, LLP are most popular:
  • within Accounting and Audit and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

Recent legislative, regulatory, and litigation developments have affected Temporary Protected Status (TPS)-related employment authorization, with implications for ongoing work authorization.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law July 4, 2025, includes a provision limiting TPS-based employment authorization documents (EADs) to a maximum validity period of one year, or the duration of an individual’s TPS status, whichever is shorter. The OBBBA also directly curtails the previously available 540-day automatic extensions that many TPS holders relied upon. An interim final rule from the Department of Homeland Security issued Oct. 30, 2025, eliminated the regulatory basis for those 540-day automatic extensions going forward.

The Deadline for TPS EAD Extensions

For TPS beneficiaries who filed EAD renewal applications before July 22, 2025, and whose applications remained pending, automatic work authorization extensions expired on July 22, 2026, regardless of any later expiration date reflected on a Form I-797C receipt notice. This affected TPS holders from El Salvador, Sudan, Ukraine, and other designated countries that had been counting on extension end dates as late as October 2026.

The Court’s Decision Upholding the 1-Year EAD Cap

Litigation over these policies has produced mixed results. On July 21, 2026, a federal court in Massachusetts temporarily stayed certain United States Citizenship and Immigration Services policies, briefly preserving prior extension expiration dates. However, on Aug. 5, 2026, that same court largely sided with the government, upholding the one-year cap policy and rejecting arguments that it was procedurally flawed or impermissibly retroactive. The court confirmed that TPS beneficiaries from El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine are subject to the July 22, 2026, expiration of their 540-day extensions.

The court did grant limited relief on an unrelated policy involving consequences for asylum applicants who failed to pay the annual asylum fee, staying that provision pending further proceedings.

Employer Considerations: I-9 Reverification and E-Verify Compliance

Employers with TPS workers on their payroll may wish to take the following steps:

  • Audit I-9 records to identify EADs tied to TPS categories A12 or C19.
  • Verify whether those EADs were subject to a 540-day automatic extension that has now been cut short.
  • Complete I-9 reverification for any affected employees.
  • Monitor E-Verify for status updates reflecting the revised expiration dates.

A Note on Ongoing TPS Litigation for Other Designated Countries

Work authorization for TPS beneficiaries from certain other countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, may still be protected by separate court orders and pending litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More