ARTICLE
2 June 2025

CoA, May 28, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_808/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
In appeal proceedings (without cross-appeal), the written procedure ends with the submission of the statement of response by the respondent pursuant to R 235, R 239.1 RoP.
European Union Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Reimbursement of fees: no extension of written procedure by opportunity for further written submissions.

In appeal proceedings (without cross-appeal), the written procedure ends with the submission of the statement of response by the respondent pursuant to R 235, R 239.1 RoP. The written procedure is not extended if the parties are allowed to file further written submissions. Such further written submissions belong to the interim procedure. As a consequence, in this stadium, the reimbursement of court fees under R 370.9 (b) RoP after a withdrawal of the appeal is limited to 40%.

2. Division

Court of Appeal

3. UPC number

UPC_CoA_808/2024, APL_66414/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Appeal proceedings, Revocation action

5. Parties

President and Fellows of Harvard College (Appellant), NanoString Europe Limited

6. Patent(s)

EP2794928

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 235, Rule 239.1 Rule 370.9 (b) RoP

self

CoA_NSTG-Harvard Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More