ARTICLE
9 June 2015

Immunity From Suit For Experts?

M
Matheson

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
The Law Reform Commission (the "LRC") recently sought submissions on their Consultation Paper on Expert Evidence.
Ireland Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Law Reform Commission (the "LRC") recently sought submissions on their Consultation Paper on Expert Evidence.  A number of topics relating to expert witnesses were considered by the LRC, an important one being whether immunity from suit, which is currently afforded to expert witnesses in this jurisdiction, should be retained. 

In Ireland, expert witnesses enjoy immunity from suit in relation to opinions given by them in the context of litigation. The rationale underpinning this rule is to ensure that experts give full and complete evidence, without a fear of liability.  This was considered by the LRC as being particularly relevant in this jurisdiction, given the relatively small pool of local experts in any one field.  The LRC suggested that anything which may discourage an individual from acting as an expert was to be avoided.

There has been no recent case law concerning experts' immunity in this jurisdiction.  However, in the case of Jones v Kaney, the Supreme Court of England and Wales, in abolishing immunity from civil liability for expert witness, considered there was no justification for the assumption that if an expert witness was liable to be sued for breach of duty, they would be discouraged from giving evidence.  In fact, the Court commented that the quality of evidence might actually be improved by the removal of immunity.  In light of the fact that such claims against experts would require the support of another expert, claims of a vexatious nature would be unlikely, and any claim would likely only arise as a result of the expert's gross negligence. 

Submissions are currently being considered by the LRC, and a final report is expected to be published by later this year.  It remains to be seen what recommendations will be included in this report regarding immunity from suit for expert witnesses in this jurisdiction – should it be retained, or abolished? 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More