EU Data Protection Vote Delayed

M
Matheson

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
A vote on the draft Data Protection Regulation has been delayed again.
Ireland Privacy

A vote on the draft Data Protection Regulation (the “Regulation”) has been delayed again. On Monday May 6 2013, the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (the “LIBE Committee”) met to discuss the latest draft of the Regulation. LIBE’s lead rapporteur, German MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht, who is charged with directing the legislation through to the final vote, explained that although several meetings have been held and some agreements have been reached, further discussion is needed in light of the significant number of amendments proposed to the Regulation.

The LIBE Committee will not accordingly be in a position to vote on the Regulation on May 29 as planned. Rapporteur Albrecht said he believes that compromises can be adopted with a broad consensus and that a vote is still possible before July.

The Irish government, which currently holds the EU presidency, is eager to hold a vote at the Member State level before the end of its presidency on July 1. However this is only possible after the European Parliament as a whole has voted, something it will not do until it has heard from the LIBE Committee.

Speaking to the LIBE committee on Monday, Dutch MEP Sophie In`t Veld said she was still worried that some Member States wanted public services removed from the regulation. Germany in particular is eager to have public services fall under a directive rather than a regulation (therefore allowing the German government greater latitude in relation to data protection issues in its public services). Sophie In't Veld stated that she felt strongly that public services should remain within the scope of the regulation.

Other controversial topics discussed during the LIBE Committee’s meeting included:

  • data portability and the right to be forgotten;
  • the meaning of anonymised and pseudonymised personal data; and
  • the 2011 Voss Report on the effectiveness of the current European Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More