ARTICLE
17 June 2020

Key Decisions – 40th GST Council Meeting

A
AMLEGALS

Contributor

AMLEGALS logo
AMLEGALS is a full service law firm with offices in Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Mumbai (Maharashtra) and operations in 14 cities of India. The firm specializes in IBC, GST, Arbitrations, Contracts and Commercial Laws and focuses equally on Proactive Litigation and Advisory.
The 40th GST Council took place on 12th June, 2020 and the key decisions taken by the Council are mentioned below.
India Tax

The 40th GST Council took place on 12th June, 2020 and the key decisions taken by the Council are mentioned below:

Waiver of Late Fee for Past Return

Proposal – No late fee for delayed filing of GSTR-3B for the period July, 2017 to January, 2020.

Applicability – For taxpayer having 'NIL liability' during the aforementioned period.

Condition File GSTR-3B for the said period between 1st July, 2020 to 30th September, 2020

Reduced Late Fee for Past Returns

Proposal – Maximum Late fee capped at Rs. 500/- per return for delayed filing of GSTR-3B for the period July, 2017 to January, 2020.

Applicability – For taxpayer having 'Tax liability' during the aforementioned period.

Condition File GSTR-3B for the said period between 1st July, 2020 to 30th September, 2020

Concessional Interest due to Covid 19

Proposal – To levy interest @9% p.a. instead of 18% p.a. on delayed payment of taxes.

Applicability – For taxpayer having turnover upto Rs. 5 Crore.

Period February, 2020 to

This content is purely an academic analysis under "Legal intelligence series".

© Copyright AMLEGALS.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this document is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion, advice or any advertisement. This document is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or corporate body. Readers should not act on the information provided herein without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the facts and circumstances of a particular situation. There can be no assurance that the judicial/quasi-judicial authorities may not take a position contrary to the views mentioned herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More