ARTICLE
10 December 2025

WhatsApp In The Witness Box - Court Holds That WhatsApp Messages Can Form A Binding Contract: Jaevee Homes Ltd v Fincham

TC
Tuli & Co

Contributor

Tuli & Co is an insurance-driven commercial litigation and regulatory practice established in 2000. With offices in New Delhi and Mumbai, we undertake work for a cross section of the Indian and international insurance and reinsurance market and work closely alongside Kennedys’ network of international offices
The UK's Technology and Construction Court ruled that WhatsApp messages can form a binding and enforceable contract.
India Technology
Nabeel Malik’s articles from Tuli & Co are most popular:
  • in India
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries
Tuli & Co are most popular:
  • within Privacy, Insurance and Finance and Banking topic(s)

The UK's Technology and Construction Court ruled that WhatsApp messages can form a binding and enforceable contract.

Background

Jaevee Homes Ltd, a property developer, claimed that Fincham Demolition, a contractor, had failed to comply with a formal subcontract for demolition work shared by email (which was never signed or accepted by Fincham). Fincham claimed that the final agreement was agreed in the following WhatsApp exchange:

Contractor: "Are we saying it's my job mate so I can start getting organized?"

Developer: "Yes."

Decision

The Court held:

  1. The WhatsApp exchange constituted a valid contract under law.
  1. The subsequent formal subcontract was irrelevant.
  1. Informality does not negate contractual intention when the messages clearly reflect consensus.

Conclusion

We have not yet seen any Indian decision on this point, but WhatsApp messages may satisfy the requirements of a valid agreement under the Indian Contract Act. For example, Indian courts are increasingly recognising arbitration agreements formed through WhatsApp messages1. However, agreements which require stamping and / or registration may face hurdles if formed via instant messaging.

* [2025] EWHC 942.

Footnote

1. See Belvedere Resources DMCC v OCL Iron & Steel Ltd 2025 SCC OnLine Del 4652.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More