- in United States
- with readers working within the Retail & Leisure industries
- within Real Estate and Construction, Corporate/Commercial Law and Finance and Banking topic(s)
Introduction:
Where does the line between inspiration and infringement lie? Film remake is a field that requires creative vision as well as a great deal of legal knowledge. Issues of copyright, key court cases, and licensing agreements play a role in what is and isn't allowed in a remake, which may also be considered plagiarism. This blog looks at the legal issues related to film remakes, and we see out which is the line between tribute and infringement we are to be drawn.
Understanding Film Remakes
A remake is, for the most part, a reiteration of a past film, which may be in the same or a different language. As opposed to adaptations, which are films based on books, plays, or true stories, or inspired works that do not acknowledge their sources, remakes are put out to retell the same story, to reprise the characters and the emotion.
For instance, in the case of Kabir Singh (2019), it was an official remake of the Telugu film Arjun Reddy (2017). On the other hand, in the 1990s, there were several what we may term as inspirations from Hollywood blockbusters that became full-scale Bollywood productions without permission, which raised legal issues.
Copyright and Intellectual Property in Films
In the Indian Copyright Act of 1957, it is stated that a film is a type of cinematograph work. The elements that are protected include the script, dialogues, music , and even character profiles. However, copyright does not cover what is presented by way of ideas. This principle, known as the idea-expression dichotomy, means that a put forth idea like "a love story between two families from opposing sides" is not copyrightable. What is protected is the author's original expression of that idea, the dialogue, the screenplay , and particular scenes.
Legal Issues in Film Remakes
The main points in film remakes are:
- Copyright Violation: Reissuing a film without the copyright owner's permission.
- Plagiarism vs. Remake: Plagiarism is passing off someone else's work as your own, whereas a lawful remake abides by licensing terms.
- Moral Rights: Original authors retain the right to be named and to protest against distortions that harm their reputation.
- Contract Issues: Many disputes arise from unclearly defined adaptation and remake rights.
Landmark Cases on Film Remakes
Courts at home and abroad have been instrumental in the development of laws related to remakes.
- RG Anand v. Deluxe Films (1978) 4 SCC 118 (SC) : In the Supreme Court's judgment, it was ruled that ideas are not patentable ; only their expression is. If the viewer believes the works are very similar, that is proof of infringement.
- In 2008, at the Calcutta High Court , Shree Venkatesh Films Pvt Ltd v. Vipul Shah determined that the film Poran Jaye Joliya Re is an unauthorized remake of Namastey London. The Court issued an injunction against its release.
- In 2010, at the Bombay High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp took on Sohail Maklai Entertainment. The Hollywood studio claimed that Knock Out was a copy of Phone Booth. They settled out of court.
These decisions note that while we may see a bit of inspiration, that is acceptable; however , if what is derived from someone else's work is too substantial , that is considered infringement.
Licensing & Permissions: The Legal Route.
The best way to do a remake is by obtaining remake rights. Through copyright assignment or a license agreement, producers can reproduce the original work. This path also includes:
- Ownership of remake rights.
- Sharing of royalties and credits.
- Protection against legal disputes.
For example, in the case of official remakes like Drishyam, which was the transfer from Malayalam to Hindi, or Laal Singh Chaddha, which was an adaptation of Forrest Gump, we saw this practice.
Cross-Border Remakes and International Treaties
The global film industry is a stage for cross-border remakes of Hollywood movies based on Asian material and Indian films that take cues from the West. International copyright treaties like the Berne Convention and TRIPS also play a role in ensuring that creators' rights are protected across different legal jurisdictions.
Cultural changes, which include setting transformations or character name variations , do not absolve a remake of liability. Unless the remake is transformative in nature, permission is still required.
Fair Use and Exceptions
Indian copyright law includes private study, criticism, and review as fair uses. However, commercial remakes seldom fit into this category. Parody and satire may be included, but most profit-oriented remakes do not qualify for fair use.
Remedies for Infringement: If original creators pursue :
- Civil Remedies: Prohibitions on release, damages, and account of profits.
- Criminal Provisions: The Copyright Act also includes terms for fines and imprisonment .
Courts have at times issued restraining orders against films that were very close to their release date when it was found that rights were being violated.
Ethical & Creative Considerations
While we have laws in place to clarify issues related to remakes, the ethics surrounding them are still up for discussion. Critics argue that remakes are a means to stifle original work; at the same time, some view them as a way for stories to reach new audiences. Films like The Departed, which was reimagined from Hong Kong's Infernal Affairs, demonstrate that good, respectful remakes may even surpass the original.
Recent Trends and Contemporary Concerns
With the rise of OTT platforms, remakes have seen a great demand. Regional films are being remade into Hindi or English for global audiences. Emerging technologies like AI and deepfakes present new issues: can AI-generated content infringe copyright? We may see current laws revisited to address these pressing concerns .
Conclusion:
Film reboots are a fact of today's industry, but their legal status is a function of copyright law. The fine line between what is inspiration and what is infringement is determined by the courts via the idea-expression principle. The best path forward legally-securing the rights to remade works-benefits both the original creators and the new wave of filmmakers.
In the spirit of collaboration and respect for intellectual property, the film industry can ensure that remakes are creative reinterpretations that , in turn, pay tribute to the original while establishing themselves as independent works of art..
References:
- RG Anand v Deluxe Films (1978) 4 SCC 118 (SC). https://blog.ipleaders.in/r-g-anand-v-ms-delux-films-and-ors-case-analysis/
- Shree Venkatesh Films Pvt Ltd v Vipul Shah (2008) Calcutta High Court. https://www.khuranaandkhurana.com/2022/06/28/copyright-infringement-bollywood-v-hollywood/
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v Sohail Maklai Entertainment (2010) Bombay High Court. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/625240/
- The Copyright Act 1957 (India). https://copyright.gov.in/documents/copyrightrules1957.pdf
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698
- TRIPS Agreement, 1994. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
