Introduction
Remixing of music is an increasingly popular trend in Indian entertainment industry particularly in Bollywood and in independent music. Although remixing may become a creative process, it is a legal minefield. Not every person knows that remixing the song is a process that includes a number of legal procedures, and the inability to follow them may have the most significant implications. In this blog, I would talk about whether music remixing is legal in India or not, about the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 applicable to this case and about the importance of contract law.
What is a Remix and How is it Treated in Law?
A remix is simply a version of a pre-existing song, in which the beats, the tempo or even certain lyrics may be altered, although the original work remains intact. A remix is legally regarded as a derivative work. The Copyright Act, 1957 does not mention the term remix, however, Section 2(a)1 describes the term adaptation to mean any use of a work that creates a new version. The owner of a copyright has the sole right to make any adaptation of his work as stated in section 14(a)(vi)2. Remixing therefore is an adaptation, and only the person holding the copyright can do it or authorize another person to do so.
Who owns the Copyrights in Music?
The Copyright Act covers music in a number of sections. A musical work is the music itself and is defined in Section 2(p)3, the lyrics to the song are a literary work and are covered in Section 2(o)4, and a sound recording is the actual recording of the song and is defined in Section 2(xx)5. That is, in order to remix a song legally, you might have to seek the rights holders of the composer (of the music), the lyricist (of the lyrics), the producer or record label (of the sound recording). In India, music labels are commonly given the rights, though in other cases composers and lyricists also have some rights, particularly due to the amendments in 20126.
What Does the Copyright Act Say About Remixing?
These are most crucial parts here are Section 14, Section 51, Section 52 and Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 147 grants the owner of a copyright the sole right to reproduce, adapt and communicate the work to the public. Remixing is included in adaptation and reproduction. Section 51(1)8 states that copyright is breached when a person, without the license of the copyright owner, performs an act that falls in the exclusive right of the copyright owner to perform. Remixing without consent is therefore an obvious infringement.
Section 529 contains some exceptions, including fair dealing with a private or personal use, criticism, or review. Commercial remixes are however not covered by these exceptions. Section 52(1)(j) permits making of sound recording in certain circumstances, provided that it is not exploiting the original, and following the payment of a statutory royalty. This can hardly be the case with popular songs undergoing remixing to be put on the market. Section 5710 provides the moral rights of authors such that they can assert authorship and raise objections on any distortion or mutation that damages their reputation. A remix that insults or in any way hurts the reputation of the original creator can be disputed, even with a license.
What Happens If You Remix Without Permission?
Remixing a song without the appropriate licenses means that you are copyright infringing under Section 51. This may be punishable under Section 6311 which prescribes a criminal punishment with imprisonment of up to three years and/or a fine. The copyright owner may also claim civil actions such as injunctions (to prevent the playing of the remix), damages and delivery up of infringing copies.
Contracts and their Role in Remixing
In practice remixing is generally dealt with by way of contracts. The music label or producer makes an agreement with the owners of the copyrights and it is stated what may be altered, how the royalties should be divided and what credits are necessary. The importance of these contracts is that they establish the terms of usage, and they also allow safeguarding of the original creator together with the remixer. In case of disagreeement, the contract will normally determine the manner in which it is to be resolved.
Moral Rights and Controversies of the Recent Past
The moral rights under section 57 had taken a very significant importance in the recent years particularly with the Bollywood remixes. Original artists have occasionally taken to courts with arguments that remixes have either misrepresented their work or have not given due credit. A widely publicized case of the legality and morality of remixes occurred in 2020 with the song "Masakali." The song was originally written by A.R. Rahman in the movie Delhi 6, but a music label released its remixed version. This latest version soon drew much popular criticism. A.R. Rahman himself issued a statement against the remix claiming that his moral rights as the original composer were being waived over. One of his believes was that remixing a song was not creativity at all and that it portrayed disrespect to the original piece of work. Rahman took this incident as a reminder to all of us about the worth of music that is well commissioned and well-crafted other than merely trying to short cut remixing old time hits. Even the lyricist of the original song Prasoon Joshi blamed the remix version stating that his work was utilized without adequate sensitivity and respect towards the original work. This shows the importance of considering the rights and emotions of original authors in relation to making remixes, both in terms of law and moral.
Conclusion
India requires music remixing that balance creativity with legal and ethical duties. According to the Copyright Act, 1957, remixers have to seek explicit permissions and observe the moral rights of original creators. Such situations as the Masakali controversy case demonstrate that sensitivity and credit are necessary. In the future, the sector ought to emphasize on clear contract agreements, equitable royalty distribution, and increased knowledge of the copyright regulations. Remixing can be an artistic process that does not cause conflicting situations or disrespect toward the original artists and the law when it is respected. This practice will sustain a healthier and more respectable music industry.
References
- Copyright Office, Government of India. (2012). The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012. https://copyright.gov.in.
- Copyright Office, Government of India. (n.d.). Copyright Rules, 1957 (as amended). https://www.copyright.gov.in/Documents/Copyrightrules1957.pdf.
- Government of India. (1957). The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957). Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1367?view_type=browse.
- (2022, September 20). An overview of the Copyright Act, 1957. https://blog.ipleaders.in/an-overview-of-the-copyright-act-1957/.
- Live Law. (2020, April 9). Bollywood Remixes and Copyright Law: A Legal Analysis. https://www.livelaw.in/columns/bollywood-remixes-and-copyright-law-165127.
Footnotes
1 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(a).
2 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 14(a)(vi).
3 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(p).
4 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(o)
5 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(xx)
6 The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012.
7 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 14.
8 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 51(1).
9 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 52.
10 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 57.
11 The Copyright Act, 1957, Section 63.
To view the original article click here
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
