ARTICLE
30 October 2019

Properties Attached As ‘Proceeds Of Crime' Under PMLA Cannot Be Part Of A Resolution Plan Under IBC

AP
AZB & Partners

Contributor

AZB & Partners is one of India's premier law firms with 500+ lawyers and offices across the country. The firm was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to provide reliable, practical and full–service advice to clients, across all sectors. Having grown steadily since its inception, AZB & Partners now has offices across Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Pune and Chennai. We are recognized by most international publications for our legal expertise.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (‘NCLAT') has on July 2, 2019 held that the properties of a corporate debtor which are attached by the Director of Enforcement.
India Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ('NCLAT') has on July 2, 20191 held that the properties of a corporate debtor which are attached by the Director of Enforcement under Section 5(1) of the PMLA fall within the definition of 'Proceeds of Crime' under Section 2(1)(u) of the PMLA and such properties cannot be a part of a resolution plan by under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('IBC').

Footnote

1 Rototmac Global Private Limited (through Anil Goel, Liquidator) v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 140 of 2019 (NCLAT).

Orignianlly published September 30, 2019.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More