ARTICLE
9 March 2026

Updated PRC Arbitration Law Comes Into Effect

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
A revised version of the PRC Arbitration Law comes into effect today (1 March 2026), marking the most significant update to the legislation since it was originally enacted in 1995.
Worldwide Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Helen Tang’s articles from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • in Asia
  • in Asia
  • in Asia
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Transport, Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment and Family and Matrimonial topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel

A revised version of the PRC Arbitration Law comes into effect today (1 March 2026), marking the most significant update to the legislation since it was originally enacted in 1995.

The most notable changes relate to foreign-related arbitration, including provisions on the seat of arbitration (Article 81), permitting offshore institutions to administer foreign-related cases from certain areas (Article 86), and allowing ad hoc arbitration in designated areas (Article 82).

Other significant changes include: a clear statutory framework for the enforcement of foreign awards (Article 88); a new mechanism allowing co-arbitrators to jointly appoint the presiding arbitrator where there is party consent (Article 43), and an expansion of arbitrator disclosure obligations to bring them in line with international standards (Article 45), both of which codify practices already reflected in the rules of major PRC arbitral institutions; various provisions relating to the scope of tribunal powers; and a reduction in the time limit for applying to set aside an arbitral award from 6 to 3 months, consistent with the UNCITRAL Model Law (Article 72).

For more information, see our previous blog (available here) and look out for more coverage of the updated legislation in the upcoming issue of Inside Arbitration, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer's flagship arbitration publication, which will be launched later this month and in which we will provide an in-depth review of the most notable changes related to foreign-related arbitration.

This article has been authored by Herbert Smith Freehills Kewei, a joint operation between Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP and Shanghai Kewei Law Firmbased in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone, which is exclusively responsible for any statements or commentary in relation to PRC law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More