ARTICLE
15 March 2010

New 5-Year Retention Period For Clinical Trial Documents

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

From 22 March 2010, the period for which sponsors must keep basic documentation of a clinical trial will be extended from two to five years.
Poland Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

From 22 March 2010, the period for which sponsors must keep basic documentation of a clinical trial will be extended from two to five years.

This change to the detailed requirements of Good Clinical Practice will only apply to existing trials where the two-year retention period has not already expired.

The retention period runs:

  • throughout the time an application to obtain marketing authorisation is being considered in any country and for five years after final authorisation has been obtained in any EU/EEA country
  • for five years from the beginning of the calendar year after the year in which the clinical trial was suspended by the sponsor

The scope of documentation required to be retained is set out in the Annex to the GCP Regulations.

Law: amendment to § 13 paragraph 1 point 3 of the GCP Regulations

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 11/03/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More