Globalization, global economic integration and trade liberalization have now become prominent in the world economy. Following such trend, Vietnam has been taking better steps to integrate into the world economy. Looking back at the nearly 30-year journey since Vietnam was a closed economy and started to implement the Doi Moi (Renovation) policy from the Party's sixth national congress when the international economic integration was simply referred to as an open economy, up to now, Vietnam's international integration policy has become much more detailed and complete. The first significant milestone in when Vietnam officially became the 150th member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 11 January 2007, after 11 years of accession negotiations. From then, a new period began: Vietnam's economy has integrated more deeply and comprehensively into the world economy.
Vietnam has participated in integration at both regional and international levels and has established meaningful relationships with major partners. Especially in recent years, Vietnam has actively participated in negotiations and signed the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), which is complementary to the goal of multilateral trade and investment liberalization when such cooperation has been facing many hurdles. Among 13 Free Trade Agreements that Vienam has signed, the FTA with the European Union (EVFTA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) must be highlighted. These two agreements are considered new-generation free trade agreements because they contain unprecedented commitments under the previous FTAs signed by Vietnam. They have encouraged and accelerated institutional reform in order to improve the legal environment in compliance with Vietnam's commitments. As a result, they help Vietnam to become a competitive economy, attract foreign investment, advanced technology and other important resources for development.
However, in order to take advantage of the incentives under these Agreements to attract foreign investment, in this article, I would like to evaluate the outstanding advantages of EVFTA and CPTPP as well as the implementation of these two Agreements from the perspective of a foreign investor with regard to: (1) market access; (2) government procurement; and (3) dispute resolution.
I. ADVANTAGES
1. Market Access
a. EVFTA
Market Access for Goods
Vietnam commits to eliminate import duties on 48.5% of tariff lines, equivalent to 64.5% of EU exports immediately after the EVFTA comes into effect on 1 August 2020. After 10 years, the elimination rate will be 99% of the total tariff lines, equal to 99.8% of the EU's exports respectively. For some products such as motorcycles over 1,500cc, automobile parts and about half of EU exported medicine products, the tax reduction mechanism will apply after 7 years from the effective date. For the remaining tariff lines, Vietnam will have a roadmap of over 10 years or give preferential treatment to the EU on the basis of tariff quotas. This is considered an unprecedented commitment to deep tax cuts for a developing country like Vietnam, which has demonstrated the ambition for deep integration and strengthened trade relations with the EU.
Market Access for Services
Although Vietnam's commitments under the WTO are used as a basis for negotiating its commitments under the EVFTA, Vietnam has not only opened additional sectors/sub-sectors for EU service providers but also made higher commitments than those outlined in the WTO resulting in EU investors being given best access to Vietnam's market. Sectors/sub-sectors that Vietnam is not committed to under the WTO, but are open for EU investors include, but not limited to: interdisciplinary Research & Development (R&D) services; nursing services, physiotherapists and para-medical personnel; packaging services; trade fairs and exhibitions services and building-cleaning services. It is worth noting that the EVFTA includes the most-favored-nation (MFN) treatment provisions that allow a party to give the other party the highest level of treatment it is negotiating with any third party in other agreement.
b. CPTPP
Market Access for Goods
Vietnam commits to eliminate nearly 100% of tariff lines, in which: (i) 65.8% of tariff lines have 0% tax rate after the CPTPP takes effect from 14 January 2019; (ii) 86.5% of tariff lines have a 0% tax rate in the fourth year after the CPTPP takes effect; (iii) 97.8% of tariff lines have 0% tax rate in the 11th year after the CPTPP takes effect; (iv) import tax on remaining items shall be abolished in the 16th year or in accordance with tariff quotas. The CPTPP also covers issues that have never been addressed in the WTO including import duties, export duties for re-manufactured goods, re-furbished goods, market access for re-furbished goods, monopolies and goods in transit.
Market Access for Services and Investment
All 11 member-states give consent to a liberalized trade in this
area. More sectors are opened under the CPTPP compared with the
WTO, such as telecommunications, distribution and manufacturing
sectors.
In addition, besides incorporating basic WTO principles (national
treatment (NT), most-favored nation treatment (MFN), market access,
and local presence), the CPTPP takes a negative approach, meaning
that their markets are fully open to service suppliers from other
CPTPP Parties, except otherwise indicated in their commitments
(i.e, non-conforming measures). In order to make such reservations,
the member state must prove the necessity of such preservation and
negotiate with other member states. If approved, non-conforming
measures must only be limited to such list, except for measures in
certain sensitive sectors that are included in a separate list.
Member states are only allowed to adopt policies that are better
than what they commit (ratchet principle). The CPTPP also includes
obligations on removal of performance requirements (i.e., no
conditions on local content requirements, export conditions, use of
certain technology, location of the investment project, etc.) and
reasonable requirements on senior management and board of
directors. Notably, the CPTPP Chapter on Investment for the first
time successfully clarified the MFN principle- countries operating
in multi-state regime must give foreign investors the best
investment conditions in all states, regardless of the location of
the state where the investment takes place. Investors are also
allowed to petition against the Government from the investment
registration stage.
2. Government Procurement
Vietnam has one of the highest ratios of public investment-to-GDP in the world (39% annually from 1995). However, until now, Vietnam has not agreed to its government procurement being covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) of the WTO. Now, for the first time, Vietnam has undertaken to do so in the EVFTA and CPTPP. Investors of member states will surely get access to large government procurement market with many incentives and advantages.
a. EVFTA
The Government Procurement Chapter mainly deals with the requirement to treat EU bidders, or domestic bidders with EU investment capital, equally with Vietnamese bidders when a Government purchases goods or requests a service worth over the specified threshold. Vietnam undertakes to publish information on tender in a timely manner, allow sufficient time for bidders to prepare for and submit bids and maintain the confidentiality of tenders. The EVFTA also requires its Parties to assess bids based on fair and objective principles, evaluate and award bids only based on criteria set out in notices and tender documents and create an effective regime for complaints and settling disputes, and so on. These rules require Parties to ensure that their bidding procedures match the commitments and protect their own interests, thus helping Vietnam to solve its problem of bids being won by cheap but low-quality service providers.
We also believe that these changes in procedures and laws related to government procurement will allow EU exporters to access previously closed markets and compete more effectively.
b. CPTPP
The CPTPP makes a list of government entities and agencies whose
procurement of particular goods and services at a particular amount
must be subject to public tender. In other words, a bidding package
is only subject to CPTPP if it satisfies all 3 criteria on the
subject matter of procurement, type of goods and services, and
procurement threshold. Any negotiation to expand coverage of the
Government Procurement chapter, particularly in relation to state
government and local government contracts, will be delayed. Parties
will only initiate talks on this issue at least five years after
the date of entry into force of the CPTPP.
This chapter includes NT and MFN principles, removes tender
conditions favoring local tenders such as using local goods or
local suppliers, conditions on technology transfer or two-way trade
and investment, etc. These rules require all parties, to reform
their bidding procedures and protect their own interests by
disqualifying tenders with poor performance and low capacity.
3. Dispute resolution
a. EVFTA
For any investment-related dispute (i.e. expropriation without compensation, investment discrimination), an investor is allowed to bring such dispute to the Investment Court for settlement (Investor-state dispute settlement mechanism- ISDS). The final arbitration award is binding and enforceable without the local courts' review of its validity. This is an advantage for European investors as the fact shows that the percentage of applications for enforcement of foreign arbitral awards being rejected by the Vietnamese courts is notably high for various reasons.
b. CPTPP
The CPTPP aims at protecting investors and their investment in
the host country by introducing requirements on non-discrimination;
fair and equitable treatment; full protection and security; the
prohibition of expropriation that is not for public purpose,
without due process, or without compensation; the free transfer of
funds related to investments; and the freedom to appoint senior
management positions regardless of nationality.
For the first time investors of a party may sue the Government of
the other party for its violation of investment-related commitments
when the investors make investment in that party. However, please
note that under the CPTPP, investors will not be able to sue the
Government using ISDS clauses if there is any dispute in connection
with an investment agreement. An investment agreement is a written
agreement that is concluded and takes effect after the date of
entry into force of the CPTPP, between an authority at the central
level of government of a Party and a covered investment or an
investor of another Party, that creates an exchange of rights and
obligations, binding on both parties under the applicable law.
Investment agreement refers to an agreement in writing, negotiated
and executed by both parties, whether in the form of single or
multiple instruments. A unilateral act of an administrative or
judicial authority, such as a permit, license, authorization,
certificate, approval, etc. and an administrative or judicial
consent decree or order will not be considered a written
agreement.
The CPTPP also includes procedures for arbitration as means of
settling disputes between investors and the host state. It covers
new provisions compared with existing agreements such as
transparency in arbitral proceedings, disclosure of filings and
arbitral awards, and participation of interested non-disputing
parties to make amicus curiae submissions to a tribunal. Arbitral
awards are final, binding and fully enforceable in CPTPP
countries.
II. DIFFICULTIES
1. Market Access
a. Market Access for Goods
As mentioned above, both the EVFTA and CPTPP contain commitments
to broad tariff cuts. However, how enterprises can make full use of
these commitments is somewhat closely related to the rules of
origin of goods.
Vietnam's manufacture sector currently depends on raw
materials imported from non-EU member countries as the value-added
amount generated from abroad is higher than in the country. If this
situation does not improve, it will be difficult for Vietnamese
goods to meet strict rules of origin in these two agreements.
Therefore, the Government should issue policies to encourage
enterprises to participate in the global value chain, reduction of
trade costs, simplification of customs procedures, and transparency
in non-tariff policies.
Besides, regarding the mechanism of certification of origin, when
as the EVFTA and Vietnamese law stipulate that the competent
authorities to issue certificates of origin, the CPTPP requires
applying a self-certification of origin mechanism- importers,
exporters and manufacturers can make self-certification of origin.
This creates an obstacle for Vietnam because Vietnam only allows a
few pilot cases of self-certification of origin in ASEAN.
Furthermore, enterprises themselves are not flexible and proactive
in determining the origin of goods, possibly leading to a delay in
tariff preferences under the CPTPP. Because there are projects
where the cost and time spent working with authorities issuing a
certification of origin is in excess of the preferential tariffs
granted, some enterprises are hesitant to apply for the
certification of origin under the agreements. As a result, tariff
preferences for goods originating from member states are not
used.
Although the CPTPP does not require Vietnam to immediately
implement this self-certification mechanism, some importing
countries may have/will apply this mechanism after the CPTPP takes
effect. Therefore, the Vietnamese government should issue
regulations on self-certification of origin as soon as possible and
consult with the business community on how to structure enterprises
and maximize the benefits of the CPTPP.
b. Market Access for Services
The CPTPP and EVFTA are considered to have created more services sectors than the WTO. However, in reality, enterprises still meet difficulties when carrying out investment in Vietnam, specifically as follows:
- Enterprise registration: Although the investor has submitted the application for enterprise registration online, the information technology system of the enterprise registration agency is somewhat outdated, leading to disruptions and delays in the process. Post-licensing procedures such as social insurance registration, seal registration, bank account opening, payment of licensing costs, etc. ...are cumbersome and time-consuming for enterprises. The Government should consider reducing unnecessary steps, or create conditions for enterprises to carry out post-licensing procedures through a portal.
- Infrastructure for electricity, transport and logistics: Weak infrastructure is a barrier to the development of Vietnam's economy. The shortage of power occurs frequently in industrial parks. Deep-sea ports currently do not meet the high demand for maritime transportation. The Government should consider development of transportation infrastructure, ensuring that seaports and airports are accessible to people but not too close to residential areas to avoid congestion.
- High cost of legal compliance: Many overlapping and conflicting documents make it difficult for enterprises to implement compliance. In particular, in many areas such as taxation, insurance, enterprises must comply with too many regulations, and many new regulations are regularly introduced which affect the stable and predictable operation of enterprises. Therefore, the Government should ensure the stability of policies, especially tax policies to attract more foreign investments.
- Corruption: Action by the Government has reduced corruption rate in recent years, however, enterprises still face with petty corruption when they carry out administrative procedures. In order to prevent this situation, the Government should apply information technology in carrying out administrative procedures (such as online filing, cameras installation to monitor administrative officers at check-in counters, etc.) as well as conduct unplanned inspections more often to control any negative issues.
- Land registration and management: It is difficult for investors to access Vietnam's land database. Public and transparent information on real estate is limited. Therefore, investors face with many difficulties when developing projects, especially projects that need to consume large land area. In order not to hinder foreign investment in the development of high quality projects, it is necessary to create favorable conditions for investors to access land information, which can be charged if necessary.
In addition, a preliminary review indicates that although Vietnam has opened more service sectors under the EVFTA and CPTPP, domestic laws still set out restrictions that should be removed soon by the Government to comply with Vietnam's commitments:
- Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (CPC 862): Vietnam economy is fully integrated under the CPTPP and EVFTA, but Vietnam laws do not allow the establishment of wholly foreign-owned enterprises operating in accounting and auditing sectors.
- Architectural services (CPC 8671): Vietnam opens this sector under the CPTPP and EVFTA but Vietnam laws require investment in this area in the form of a joint venture or foreign investors must use Vietnamese subcontractors.
- Basic telecommunications services: Vietnam law complies with the commitments under the CPTPP but it is not compatible with the level of accession required under the EVFTA.
- Regarding the list of goods that foreign investors are not permitted to distribute: CPTPP makes a longer list than that set out in Vietnam laws.
- Higher education services (CPC 923), adult education (CPC 924), and other education services (CPC 929 including foreign language training): Vietnam is committed to fully open these under the CPTPP and EVFTA (except requirements on foreign teachers' experience and qualifications). However, Vietnam law sets out conditions for foreign investors such as conditions on facilities, number of lecturers, etc.
- Customs clearance/customs brokerage services: Vietnam is committed to fully open these services under the CPTPP and EVFTA, but Vietnam law provides restrictions.
- Container handling services (CPC 741): Vietnam is committed to fully open these sectors under the CPTPP, but domestic laws provide restrictions.
2. Government Procurement
Both the CPTPP and EVFTA require the disclosure of bidding
information and transparency in the selection of contractors,
however, in fact the bidding period is prolonged, openness and
transparency in the bidding information is limited, many bidding
packages are invited only for formality, evaluation of bid
documents are not based on criteria of tender documents. If this
situation continues, foreign investors will hesitate to participate
in bidding in Vietnam.
To solve this problem, the Ministry of Planning and Investment has
vigorously promoted online bidding. Online bidding has contributed
to the end of "blue army, red army" situation
("quân xanh, quân d?"), which limited
transparency in bidding. In addition, template dossiers used for
goods procurement, construction and consultancy are posted on the
system, helping investors to fill in information for each step and
each stage. After completion, information will be processed by the
system to provide bidding price based on the bidding unit price and
the quantity of goods/services of the bidding package to make the
bidding process take place more quickly and conveniently.
Despite many advantages, the online bidding rate is not high. This
is because the bidding network system is weak, is not regularly
upgraded and its interface is not friendly with users. Furthermore,
the awareness of enterprises about the advantages of online bidding
is limited, so they are not willing to participate in electronic
bidding packages. In order for online bidding to become popular and
further enhance transparency, the Department of Public Procurement
should propagate and train enterprises on online bidding so that
they are willing to participate in more electronic bidding packages
in the system.
3. Dispute Resolution
Under the Civil Procedure Code, any judgment or decision (civil)
of a foreign jurisdiction is effective in Vietnam if the competent
court of Vietnam recognizes it. The Vietnamese court will recognize
any judgments or decisions issued by the courts of the country with
which Vietnam has signed a mutual legal assistance agreement. In
addition, recognition can also be considered on a reciprocal basis
without any mutual legal assistance agreement.
However, under the CPTPP and EVIPA, the arbitral award will be
final and binding on the parties and can be enforced directly
without recognition and enforcement mechanism of foreign arbitral
awards in Vietnam. Although Vietnam has reserved the right to
fulfill this commitment for 5 years, the Government should study
and revise the domestic laws in this regard right now to ensure
they comply with the commitments under CPTPP and EVIPA. Any
amendments of domestic regulations made on timely basis will make
foreign investors feel safe and secured in their investments in
case any dispute occurs.
Originally published July 22, 2020.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.