ARTICLE
19 January 2024

Court Of Appeal, 11 December 2023, Order Of The Court Of Appeal Of The UPC, UPC_CoA_404/2023, App_584498/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Procedural Court order allowing the parties to comment on several procedural aspects, in particular whether Rule 8 RoP applies.
Germany Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key takeaways

Procedural Court order allowing the parties to comment on several procedural aspects, in particular whether Rule 8 RoP applies.

Court

Court of Appeal

UPC number

UPC_CoA_404/2023

Type of proceedings

Appeal infringement proceedings

Parties

Ocado Innovation Limited (Plaintiff) and

(1) Autostore AS
(2) Autostore Sp. z o.o.
(3) Autostore System AB
(4) Autostore S.A.S.
(5) Autostore System GmbH
(6) Autostore System AT GmbH
(7) Autostore System Srl
(8) Autostore System S.L
(Defendants)

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 8 RoP

To view the full article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More